Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2003–2018

Open access
Dang, Keke, Wang, Xuanyang, Hu, Jinxia, Zhang, Yuntao, Cheng, Licheng, Qi, Xiang, Liu, Lin, Ming, Zhu, Tao, Xinmiao, Li, Ying·2024·Cardiovascular Diabetology

Abstract

Background: In the American population, the relationship between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and TYG combined with indicators of obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its mortality has been less well studied. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 11,937 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2018. Cox proportional hazards model, binary logistic regression analyses, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used to analyze the relationship between TyG and its combined obesity-related indicators and CVD and its mortality. Mediation analysis explored the mediating role of glycated hemoglobin and insulin in the above relationships. Results: In this study, except for no significant association between TyG and CVD mortality, TyG, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and TyG-BMI were significantly and positively associated with CVD and CVD mortality. TyG-WHtR is the strongest predictor of CVD mortality (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21–2.29). The TyG index correlated better with the risk of coronary heart disease (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.66–3.83). TyG-WC correlated best with total CVD (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.77–3.17), congestive heart failure (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.31–3.51), and angina pectoris (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.43–3.97). TyG-WHtR correlated best with myocardial infarction (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.45–3.44). RCS analyses showed that most of the above relationships were linear (P-overall < 0.0001, P-nonlinear > 0.05). Otherwise, ROC curves showed that TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC had more robust diagnostic efficacy than TyG. In mediation analyses, glycated hemoglobin mediated in all the above relationships and insulin-mediated in partial relationships. Conclusions: TyG-WC and TyG-WtHR enhance CVD mortality prediction, diagnostic efficacy of CVD and its mortality, and correlation with some CVD over and above the current hottest TyG. TyG-WC and TyG-WtHR are expected to become more effective metrics for identifying populations at early risk of cardiovascular disease and improve risk stratification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12933-023-02115-9

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Dang, K., Wang, X., Hu, J., Zhang, Y., Cheng, L., Qi, X., Liu, L., Ming, Z., Tao, X., & Li, Y.
Venue
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Published
2024-01-06
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1475-2840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390640401
Cited by
599
References
54
FWCI
162.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2003–2018. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12933-023-02115-9
The paper
Dang, K., Wang, X., Hu, J., Zhang, Y., Cheng, L., Qi, X., Liu, L., Ming, Z., Tao, X., & Li, Y. (2024). The association between triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators and cardiovascular disease: NHANES 2003–2018. Cardiovascular Diabetology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-02115-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.