Resistant starch and protein intake enhances fat oxidation and feelings of fullness in lean and overweight/obese women
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Diets high in either resistant starch or protein have been shown to aid in weight management. We examined the effects of meals high in non-resistant or resistant starch with and without elevated protein intake on substrate utilization, energy expenditure, and satiety in lean and overweight/obese women. METHODS: Women of varying levels of adiposity consumed one of four pancake test meals in a single-blind, randomized crossover design: 1) waxy maize (control) starch (WMS); 2) waxy maize starch and whey protein (WMS+WP); 3) resistant starch (RS); or 4) RS and whey protein (RS+WP). RESULTS: Total post-prandial energy expenditure did not differ following any of the four test meals (WMS = 197.9 ± 8.9; WMS+WP = 188 ± 8.1; RS = 191.9 ± 8.9; RS+WP = 195.8 ± 8.7, kcals/180 min), although the combination of RS+WP, but not either intervention alone, significantly increased (P <0.01) fat oxidation (WMS = 89.5 ± 5.4; WMS+WP = 84.5 ± 7.2; RS = 97.4 ± 5.4; RS+WP = 107.8 ± 5.4, kcals/180 min). Measures of fullness increased (125% vs. 45%) and hunger decreased (55% vs. 16%) following WP supplemented versus non-whey conditions (WMS+WP, RS+WP vs. WMS, RS), whereas circulating hunger and satiety factors were not different among any of the test meals. However, peptide YY (PYY) was significantly elevated at 180 min following RS+WP meal. CONCLUSIONS: The combined consumption of dietary resistant starch and protein increases fat oxidation, PYY, and enhances feelings of satiety and fullness to levels that may be clinically relevant if maintained under chronic conditions. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02418429.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Akkermansia fed to mice has a positive impact on reducing seizures, providing a potential mechanism for the neuroprotective effects of a ketogenic diet.
“Akkermansia fed to mice has a positive impact on reducing seizures, providing a potential mechanism for the observed neuroprotective effects of a ketogenic diet [66, 202].”
From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [202]
A ketogenic diet alters gut microbiota composition, leading to an increase in Akkermansia abundance.
“a ketogenic diet alters gut microbiota composition leading to an increase in Akkermansia abundance.”
From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [202]
Adding fiber, including resistant starch, to high-protein diets may help reduce potential negative effects of high protein consumption and may increase fat oxidation.
“adding fiber, including resistant starch, to high protein diets may help reduce potential negative effects of high protein consumption [222] and may increase fat oxidation [202], further illustrating the importance of consuming adequate dietary fiber for gut and overall health.”
From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [202]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Gentile, C. L., Ward, E., Holst, J. J., Astrup, A., Ormsbee, M. J., Connelly, S., & Arciero, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Skidmore College (US)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arciero, Paul J.
- Venue
- Nutrition Journal
- Published
- 2015-10-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-113
- ISSN
- 1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4627411
- OpenAlex
- W1899356271
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Connelly Foundation (IRB: 1307-348)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- resistant starch, dietary protein, whey protein, fat oxidation, satiety, postprandial energy expenditure, peptide YY, waxy maize starch, overweight women, obesity, weight management, hunger
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Satiety Response, Starch, Thinness, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review