The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has numerous applications and has gained much interest in the medical world. The constantly improving quality of 3D-printing applications has contributed to their increased use on patients. This paper summarizes the literature on surgical 3D-printing applications used on patients, with a focus on reported clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS: Three major literature databases were screened for case series (more than three cases described in the same study) and trials of surgical applications of 3D printing in humans. RESULTS: 227 surgical papers were analyzed and summarized using an evidence table. The papers described the use of 3D printing for surgical guides, anatomical models, and custom implants. 3D printing is used in multiple surgical domains, such as orthopedics, maxillofacial surgery, cranial surgery, and spinal surgery. In general, the advantages of 3D-printed parts are said to include reduced surgical time, improved medical outcome, and decreased radiation exposure. The costs of printing and additional scans generally increase the overall cost of the procedure. CONCLUSION: 3D printing is well integrated in surgical practice and research. Applications vary from anatomical models mainly intended for surgical planning to surgical guides and implants. Our research suggests that there are several advantages to 3D-printed applications, but that further research is needed to determine whether the increased intervention costs can be balanced with the observable advantages of this new technology. There is a need for a formal cost-effectiveness analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of antihypertensive agents on sleep apnea: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Cichelero, F. T., Martinez, D., Fuchs, S. C., Gus, M., Moreira, L. B., & Fuchs, F. D. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-1 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Digital Light Processing Based Three-dimensional Printing for Medical Applications
Zhang, J., Hu, Q., Wang, S., Tao, J., & Gou, M. (2019) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242 · Cited by 359
Sriwastwa, A., Ravi, P., Emmert, A., Chokshi, S., Kondor, S., Dhal, K., Patel, P., Chepelev, L. L., Rybicki, F. J., & Gupta, R. (2023) · 3D Printing in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s41205-023-00186-8 · Cited by 28
Comparing three‐dimensional models of placenta accreta spectrum with surgical findings
Mulligan, K. M., Bartels, H. C., Armstrong, F., Immel, E., Corcoran, S., Walsh, J. M., McAuliffe, F., McParland, P., Carroll, S., Higgins, S., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13743 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Tack, P., Victor, J., Gemmel, P., & Annemans, L.
- Venue
- BioMedical Engineering OnLine
- Published
- 2016-10-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-115
- ISSN
- 1475-925X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2538639213
- Cited by
- 1,098
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
- The paper
- Tack, P., Victor, J., Gemmel, P., & Annemans, L. (2016). 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.