The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Equity is one of the major goals of China's recent health system reform. This study aimed to evaluate the equality of the distribution of health resources and health services between hospitals and primary care institutions. METHODS: Data of this study were drawn from the China Health Statistical Year Books. We calculated Gini coefficients based on population size and geographic size, respectively, for the indicators: number of institutions, number of health workers and number of beds; and the concentration index (CI) for the indicators: per capita outpatient visits and annual hospitalization rates. RESULTS: The Gini coefficients against population size ranged between 0.17 and 0.44 in the hospital sector, indicating a relatively good equality. The primary care sector showed a slightly higher level of Gini coefficients (around 0.45) in the number of health workers. However, inequality was evident in the geographic distribution of health resources. The Gini coefficients exceeded 0.7 in the geographic distribution of institutions, health workers and beds in both the hospital and the primary care sectors, indicating high levels of inequality. The CI values of hospital inpatient care and outpatient visits to primary care institutions were small (ranging from -0.02 to 0.02), indicating good wealth-related equality. The CI values of outpatient visits to hospitals ranged from 0.16 to 0.21, indicating a concentration of services towards the richer populations. By contrast, the CI values of inpatient care in primary care institutions ranged from -0.24 to -0.22, indicating a concentration of services towards the poorer populations. The eastern developed region also had a high internal inequality compared with the other less developed regions. CONCLUSION: Significant inequality in the geographic distribution of health resources is evident, despite a more equitable per capita distribution of resources. Richer people are more likely to use well-resourced hospitals for outpatient care. By contrast, poorer people are more likely to use poorly-resourced primary care institutions for inpatient care. There is a risk of the emergence of a two-tiered health care delivery system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the measurement of inequalities in health
Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & van Doorslaer, E. (1991) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u · Cited by 1,810
Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and their Implementation
O'Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2007) · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-6933-3 · Cited by 1,156
The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics
(2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238828.001.0001 · Cited by 463
Socioeconomic Status and Health: Dimensions and Mechanisms
Cutler, D., Lleras-Muney, A., & Vogl, T. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14333 · Cited by 387
Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E. K. A., Wagstaff, W., & Lindelöw, M. (2008) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/fcm7-vvv1 · Cited by 290
Health and economic growth : findings and policy implications
Casasnovas, G. L. I., Rivera, B., & Currais, L. (2005) · Cited by 256
Regional inequality in health and its determinants: Evidence from China
Fang, P., Dong, S., Xiao, J., Liu, C., Feng, X., & Wang, Y. (2010) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.08.002 · Cited by 236
Self-citationHorizontal equity in health care utilization in Brazil, 1998–2008
Macinko, J., & Lima-Costa, M. (2012) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-33 · Cited by 192
National equity of health resource allocation in China: data from 2009 to 2013
Liu, W., Liu, Y., Twum, P., & Li, S. (2016) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0357-1 · Cited by 176
Yu, B., Meng, Q., Collins, C., Tolhurst, R., Tang, S., Yan, F., Bogg, L., & Liu, X. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-116 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Liu, H., Li, R., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., Yusufu, M., Liu, Y., Mou, D., Chen, X., Tian, J., Li, H., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00554-x · Cited by 111
Environmentally sustainable development and use of artificial intelligence in health care
Richie, C. (2022) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.13018 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, T., Xu, Y., Ren, J., Sun, L., & Liu, C.
- Venue
- International Journal for Equity in Health
- Published
- 2017-03-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-42
- ISSN
- 1475-9276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593124197
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12939-017-0543-9
- The paper
- Zhang, T., Xu, Y., Ren, J., Sun, L., & Liu, C. (2017). Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions. International Journal for Equity in Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0543-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.