Cited by 1,810Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

On the measurement of inequalities in health

Open access
Wagstaff, Adam, Paci, Pierella, van Doorslaer, Eddy·1991·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This paper offers a critical appraisal of the various methods employed to date to measure inequalities in health. It suggests that only two of these--the slope index of inequality and the concentration index--are likely to present an accurate picture of socioeconomic inequalities in health. The paper also presents several empirical examples to illustrate of the dangers of using other measures such as the range, the Lorenz curve and the index of dissimilarity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research supports the expectation that COVID-19 cases and deaths would be concentrated in lower income sub-city units.

    “there is ample research supporting the expectation that COVID-19 cases and deaths would be concentrated in lower income sub-city units.”
  • Concentration indices are robust to differences in sub-city unit population size, measure the spectrum of inequality across the entire city's population, and are widely used in health inequality research.

    “These bivariate measures of inequality are commonly used in epidemiology because they are robust to differences in sub-city unit population size, measure the spectrum of inequality across the entire city’s population, and are widely used in health inequality research [48, 49].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & van Doorslaer, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
545-557
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009288217
Cited by
1,810
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 69
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
health disparities, socioeconomic inequalities in health, inequality measurement, slope index of inequality, concentration index, Lorenz curve, index of dissimilarity, range
MeSH terms
Abstracting and Indexing, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Research, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Morbidity, Mortality, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Social Class, Social Justice, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review