Cited by 43Child and Adolescent HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcarePublic Health and Social Inequalities

A better start for health equity? Qualitative content analysis of implementation of extended postnatal home visiting in a disadvantaged area in Sweden

Open access
Barboza, Madelene, Kulane, Asli, Burström, Bo, Marttila, Anneli·2018·International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health inequities among children in Sweden persist despite the country's well-developed welfare system and near universal access to the national child health care programme. A multisectoral extended home visiting intervention, based on the principles of proportionate universalism, has been carried out in a disadvantaged area since 2013. The present study investigates the content of the meetings between families and professionals during the home visits to gain a deeper understanding of how it relates to a health equity perspective on early childhood development. METHODS: Three child health care nurses documented 501 visits to the families of 98 children between 2013 and 2016. A qualitative data-driven conventional content analysis was performed on all data from the cycle of six visits per child, and a general content model was developed. Additional content analysis was carried out on the data from visits to families who experienced adverse situations or greater needs. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that the home visits covered three main categories of content related to the health, care and development of the child; the strengthening of roles and relations within the new family unit; and the influence and support located in the broader external context around the family. The model of categories and sub-categories proved stable over all six visits. Families with extra needs received continuous attention to their additional issues during the visits, as well as the standard content described in the content model. CONCLUSIONS: This study on home visiting implementation indicates that the participating families received programme content which covered all the domains of nurturing care as recommended by the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health and recent research. The content of the home visits can be understood to create enabling conditions for health equity effects. The intervention can be seen to represent a practical example of proportionate universalism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12939-018-0756-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Home visits represent a cost-effective way of identifying and supporting vulnerable families.

    “Home visits represent a cost-effective way of identifying and supporting vulnerable families (Olds et al., 2007; Barboza et al., 2018).”

    From Extended home visits can provide multidimensional adapted professional support for parents – an intervention study (2023) · cites this paper as Barboza et al., 2018

    The Results (‘Families with extra needs’; page not provided) describe visits in which professionals identified and addressed families’ specific needs, and the Discussion (‘Proportionate universalism in practice’; page not provided) describes needs assessment and additional support. The paper does not establish that home visits are cost-effective; its reported analysis is qualitative, not an economic evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When child health care nurses, in collaboration with family supporters, offer parents more home visits during their children's first year of life, their parenting abilities are strengthened, which has positive effects on their children's health.

    “International research has shown that when child health care (CHC) nurses, in collaboration with family supporters (within social service), offer parents more home visits during their children’s first year of life, their parenting abilities are strengthened, which has positive effects on their children’s health (Aronen and Arajarvi, 2000; Olds et al., 2007; Barboza et al., 2018).”

    From Extended home visits can provide multidimensional adapted professional support for parents – an intervention study (2023) · cites this paper as Barboza et al., 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even if they were proportionate most of them were not universal but specifically implemented in deprived area.

    “Even if they were proportionate most of them were not universal but specifically implemented in deprived area (37,50,62).”
  • Home visits can especially support three-way relationships between mother and child, father and child, and mother and father, in addition to strengthening the role of each parent.

    “Research has reported that home visits can promote healthy family functioning and positive parenting in early childhood (Minkovitz et al., 2016) and can especially support three-way relationships between mother and child, father and child, and mother and father, in addition to strengthening the role of each parent (Barboza et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [2]Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. Fair society, healthy lives. The Marmot review. 2010. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/fair-society-healthy-lives-full-report.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2017.
  2. [4]Richter LM Daelmans B Lombardi J Heymann J Boo FL Behrman JR Lu C Lucas JE Perez-Escamilla R Dua T Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development Lancet 2017 389 103 118 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31698-1 27717610 PMC5880532 · DOI
  3. [7]Olds DL Sadler L Kitzman H Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007 48 355 391 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01702.x 17355402 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [8]Aronen ET Kurkela SA Long-term effects of an early home-based intervention J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996 35 1665 1672 10.1097/00004583-199612000-00019 8973074 · DOI
  5. [9]Kitzman HJ Olds DL Cole RE Hanks CA Anson EA Arcoleo KJ Luckey DW Knudtson MD Henderson CR Jr Holmberg JR Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on children: follow-up of a randomized trial among children at age 12 years Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010 164 412 418 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.76 20439791 PMC4225617 · DOI
  6. [14]Burstrom B Marttila A Kulane A Lindberg L Burstrom K Practising proportionate universalism - a study protocol of an extended postnatal home visiting programme in a disadvantaged area in Stockholm, Sweden BMC Health Serv Res 2017 17 91 10.1186/s12913-017-2038-1 28129751 PMC5273844 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [17]Orton L Lloyd-Williams F Taylor-Robinson D Moonan M Flaherty M Capewell S Prioritising public health: a qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities BMC Public Health 2011 11 821 10.1186/1471-2458-11-821 22014291 PMC3206485 · DOI
  8. [18]Bambra C Gibson M Sowden A Wright K Whitehead M Petticrew M Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews J Epidemiol Community Health 2010 64 284 10.1136/jech.2008.082743 19692738 PMC2921286 · DOI
  9. [19]Weiss CH Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future N Dir Eval 1997 1997 76 41 55 10.1002/ev.1086 · DOI
  10. [20]Whitehead M A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61 473 10.1136/jech.2005.037242 17496254 PMC2465710 · DOI
  11. [21]Korfmacher J Green B Staerkel F Peterson C Cook G Roggman L Faldowski RA Schiffman R Parent involvement in early childhood home visiting Child Youth Care Forum 2008 37 171 196 10.1007/s10566-008-9057-3 · DOI
  12. [22]Sweet MA Appelbaum MI Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children Child Dev 2004 75 1435 1456 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x 15369524 · DOI
  13. [23]Saias T Lerner E Greacen T Simon-Vernier E Emer A Pintaux E Guedeney A Dugravier R Tereno S Falissard B Evaluating fidelity in home-visiting programs a qualitative analysis of 1058 home visit case notes from 105 families PLoS One 2012 7 e36915 10.1371/journal.pone.0036915 22629341 PMC3356353 · DOI
  14. [25]Hsieh HF Shannon SE Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qual Health Res 2005 15 1277 1288 10.1177/1049732305276687 16204405 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [26]Pope C Ziebland S Mays N Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data BMJ 2000 320 114 116 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 10625273 PMC1117368 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [27]Green J Thorogood N Qualitative methods for health research 2014 Los Angeles SAGE
  17. [28]Black MM Walker SP Fernald LC Andersen CT DiGirolamo AM Lu C McCoy DC Fink G Shawar YR Shiffman J Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course Lancet 2017 389 77 90 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7 27717614 PMC5884058 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [29]Britto PR Lye SJ Proulx K Yousafzai AK Matthews SG Vaivada T Perez-Escamilla R Rao N Ip P Fernald LC Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development Lancet 2017 389 91 102 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3 27717615 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [31]Cowley S Whittaker K Malone M Donetto S Grigulis A Maben J Why health visiting? Examining the potential public health benefits from health visiting practice within a universal service: a narrative review of the literature Int J Nurs Stud 2015 52 465 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.013 25304286 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [33]Turnbull H Loptson K Muhajarine N Experiences of housing insecurity among participants of an early childhood intervention programme Child Care Health Dev 2014 40 435 440 10.1111/cch.12091 23909646 · DOI
  21. [34]McIntosh J Shute J The process of health visiting and its contribution to parental support in the starting well demonstration project Health Soc Care Commun 2007 15 77 85 17212628

Authors
Barboza, M., Kulane, A., Burström, B., & Marttila, A.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Barboza, Madelene
Venue
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
42-42
ISSN
1475-9276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801208507
Cited by
43
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for Equity in Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • Public Health Agency of Sweden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
health equity, early childhood development, child health care, proportionate universalism, nurturing care, pediatric nurses, disadvantaged families, social determinants of health, family support
MeSH terms
Child Health, Maternal-Child Health Services, Health Equity, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Surveys, House Calls, Humans, Infant, Postnatal Care, Poverty, Sweden, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review