The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ambient PM2.5 and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction: impact of regional PM2.5 oxidative potential: a case-crossover study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Regional differences in the oxidative potential of fine particulate air pollution (PM2.5) may modify its impact on the risk of myocardial infarction. METHODS: A case-crossover study was conducted in 16 cities in Ontario, Canada to evaluate the impact of regional PM2.5 oxidative potential on the relationship between PM2.5 and emergency room visits for myocardial infarction. Daily air pollution and meteorological data were collected between 2004 and 2011 from provincial monitoring sites and regional estimates of glutathione (OP(GSH)) and ascorbate-related (OP(AA)) oxidative potential were determined using an acellular assay based on a synthetic respiratory tract lining fluid. Exposure variables for the combined oxidant capacity of NO2 and O3 were also examined using their sum (Ox) and a weighted average (Ox (wt)) based on their redox potentials. RESULTS: In total, 30,101 cases of myocardial infarction were included in the analysis. For regions above the 90(th) percentile of OP(GSH) each 5 μg/m(3) increase in same-day PM2.5 was associated with a 7.9 % (95 % CI: 4.1, 12) increased risk of myocardial infarction whereas a 4.1 % (95 % CI: 0.26, 8.0) increase was observed in regions above the 75(th) percentile and no association was observed below the 50(th) percentile (p-interaction = 0.026). A significant 3-way interaction was detected with the strongest associations between PM2.5 and myocardial infarction occurring in areas with high regional OP(GSH) and high Ox (wt) (p-interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Regional PM2.5 oxidative potential may modify the impact of PM2.5 on the risk of myocardial infarction. The combined oxidant capacity of NO2 and O3 may magnify this effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. (., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0 · Cited by 4,929
Fang, T., Guo, H., Zeng, L., Verma, V., Nenes, A., & Weber, R. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b06151 · Cited by 584
Shen, J., Griffiths, P. T., Campbell, S. J., Utinger, B., Kalberer, M., & Paulson, S. E. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86477-8 · Cited by 267
Oxidative stress and the cardiovascular effects of air pollution
Miller, M. R. (2020) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.01.004 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Weichenthal, S., Lavigne, E., Evans, G., Pollitt, K., & Burnett, R. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Health
- Published
- 2016-03-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-46
- ISSN
- 1476-069X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312067194
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient PM2.5 and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction: impact of regional PM2.5 oxidative potential: a case-crossover study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12940-016-0129-9
- The paper
- Weichenthal, S., Lavigne, E., Evans, G., Pollitt, K., & Burnett, R. T. (2016). Ambient PM2.5 and risk of emergency room visits for myocardial infarction: impact of regional PM2.5 oxidative potential: a case-crossover study. Environmental Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0129-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.