Cited by 71Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsMetastasis and carcinoma case studies

Endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma arising in caesarean section scar: a case report and review of the literature

Open access
Ferrandina, Gabriella, Palluzzi, Eleonora, Fanfani, Francesco, Gentileschi, Stefano, Valentini, Anna Lia, Mattoli, Maria Vittoria, Pennacchia, Ilaria, Scambia, Giovanni +1 more·2016·World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract

Malignant transformation has been reported in approximately 1% of the endometriosis cases; herein, we report a case of clear cell endometrial carcinoma arising from endometriosis foci located within a caesarean section scar. In November 2014, a Caucasian, 44-year-old woman was transferred to our institution because of severe respiratory failure due to massive lung embolism and rapid enlargement of a subcutaneous suprapubic mass. Abdomino-pelvic magnetic resonance showed a 10.5 × 5.0 × 5.0 cm subcutaneous solid mass involving the rectus abdominis muscle. Pelvic organs appeared normal, while right external iliac lymph nodes appeared enlarged (maximum diameter = 16 mm). A whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan showed irregular uptake of the radiotracer in the 22 cm mass of the abdominal wall, and in enlarged external iliac and inguinal lymph nodes. In December 2014, the patient underwent exploratory laparoscopy showing normal adnexae and pelvic organs; peritoneal as well as cervical, endometrial and vesical biopsies were negative. The patient was administered neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, weekly, without benefit and then underwent wide resection of the abdominal mass, partial removal of rectus abdominis muscle and fascia, radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The muscular gap was repaired employing a gore-tex mesh while the external covering was made by a pedicled perforator fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap. Final diagnosis was clear cell endometrial adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis foci within the caesarean section scar. Pelvic and inguinal lymph nodes were metastatic. Tumor cells were positive for CK7 EMA, CKAE1/AE3, CD15, CA-125, while immunoreaction for Calretinin, WT1, estrogen, and progesterone receptors, cytokeratin 20, CD10, alpha fetoprotein, CDX2, TTF1, and thyroglobulin were all negative. Liver relapse occurred after 2 months; despite 3 cycles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m 2 , biweekly administration), the death of the patient disease occurred 1 month later. Attention should be focused on careful evaluation of patient history in terms of pelvic surgery, and symptoms suggestive of endometriosis such as repeated occurrence of endometriosis nodules at CS scar, or cyclic pain, or volume changes of the nodules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12957-016-1054-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are 23 cases of clear cell carcinoma arising from endometriotic scars reported in the literature.

    “There are 23 cases of CCC arising from endometriotic scars reported in the literature [9]”

    From Cesarean Section: A Potential and Forgotten Risk for Abdominal Wall Endometriosis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Background and Discussion describe clear cell carcinoma arising in surgical scars and review previously reported cases. The passages do not establish the specific total of 23 cases; the Discussion also notes that almost one third of the reviewed caesarean-scar cases lacked identified endometriosis foci. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • About 1% of endometriosis cases develop into a malignancy, most of which occur at the ovary.

    “Endometriosis-associated malignant transformation is rare; about 1 % of the endometriosis cases have developed into a malignancy, most of which happened at the ovary [9].”
  • Increasing cesarean section rates are expected to increase the diagnosis of C-section scar endometriosis and its malignant transformation.

    “Based on this crescent rate, it is expected a subsequent increase in the diagnosis of endometriosis from C-section scar and a more significant occurrence of its transformation into malignancy [9].”
  • One-third of case reports of clear cell carcinoma arising in cesarean section scars were not associated with endometriosis near the tumor.

    “However, one-third of case reports in the literature of clear cell carcinoma arising in cesarean section scars were not associated with endometriosis near the tumor [24].”
  • A prosthetic mesh or in some cases, a pedicle-skin-muscle flap, is used for abdominal wall repair and reinforcement depending on the extent of surgical resection.

    “A prosthetic mesh or in some cases, a pedicle-skin-muscle flap, is used for abdominal wall repair and reinforcement depending on the extent of surgical resection [23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 71

Authors
Ferrandina, G., Palluzzi, E., Fanfani, F., Gentileschi, S., Valentini, A. L., Mattoli, M. V., Pennacchia, I., Scambia, G., & Zannoni, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Molise (IT)
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Ferrandina, Gabriella
Venue
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2016-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
300-300
ISSN
1477-7819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558367543
Cited by
71
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • World Journal of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
Keywords
cesarean section scar, malignant transformation of endometriosis, abdominal wall mass, pulmonary embolism, lymph node metastasis, radical hysterectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Adult, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cesarean Section, Cicatrix, Doxorubicin, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Liver Neoplasms, Lymph Node Excision, Lymphatic Metastasis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ovariectomy, Pelvis, Laparoscopy, Polyethylene Glycols, Pregnancy, Endometrial Neoplasms, Rectus Abdominis, Fatal Outcome, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Abdominal Wall, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Salpingectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review