Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 888

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity

Open access
Smith, Melody, Hosking, Jamie, Woodward, Alistair, Witten, Karen, MacMillan, Alexandra, Field, Adrian, Baas, Peter, Mackie, Hamish·2017·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence is mounting to suggest a causal relationship between the built environment and people's physical activity behaviours, particularly active transport. The evidence base has been hindered to date by restricted consideration of cost and economic factors associated with built environment interventions, investigation of socioeconomic or ethnic differences in intervention effects, and an inability to isolate the effect of the built environment from other intervention types. The aims of this systematic review were to identify which environmental interventions increase physical activity in residents at the local level, and to build on the evidence base by considering intervention cost, and the differential effects of interventions by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted in June 2015. Articles were eligible if they reported a quantitative empirical study (natural experiment or a prospective, retrospective, experimental, or longitudinal research) investigating the relationship between objectively measured built environment feature(s) and physical activity and/or travel behaviours in children or adults. Quality assessment was conducted and data on intervention cost and whether the effect of the built environment differed by ethnicity or socioeconomic status were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in the review. Findings showed a positive effect of walkability components, provision of quality parks and playgrounds, and installation of or improvements in active transport infrastructure on active transport, physical activity, and visits or use of settings. There was some indication that infrastructure improvements may predominantly benefit socioeconomically advantaged groups. Studies were commonly limited by selection bias and insufficient controlling for confounders. Heterogeneity in study design and reporting limited comparability across studies or any clear conclusions to be made regarding intervention cost. CONCLUSIONS: Improving neighbourhood walkability, quality of parks and playgrounds, and providing adequate active transport infrastructure is likely to generate positive impacts on activity in children and adults. The possibility that the benefits of infrastructure improvements may be inequitably distributed requires further investigation. Opportunities to improve the quality of evidence exist, including strategies to improve response rates and representativeness, use of valid and reliable measurement tools, cost-benefit analyses, and adequate controlling for confounders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Oliver M, Parker K, Witten K, Mavoa S, Badland H, Donovan P, Chaudhury M, Kearns RA. Children’s out-of-school independently mobile trips, active travel, and physical activity: a cross-sectional examination from the kids in the City study. JPAH. 2016;13:318–24. · doi:10.1123/jpah.2015-0043
  2. Hopgood T, Percival T, Stewart J, Ameratunga S. A tale of two cities: paradoxical intensity of traffic calming around Auckland schools. N Z Med J. 2013;126:22–8.
  3. Goodman A, Sahlqvist S, Ogilvie D. iConnect c: who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? Longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study. Prev Med. 2013;57:518–24. · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.007
  4. Smith M. Systematic Review Protocol. figshare. 2017. Retrieved September 26, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17608/k6.auckland.5445586.v1 . · doi:10.17608/k6.auckland.5445586.v1
  5. Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specific-resources-review-authors .
  6. West ST, Shores KA. Does building a greenway promote physical activity among proximate residents? J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:52–7. · doi:10.1123/jpah.2012-0411
  7. Krizek K. Pretest-posttest strategy for researching neighborhood-scale urban form and travel behavior. Trans Res Rec. 1722;2000:48–55.
  8. Harduar-Morano L, Price JR, Parker D, Blackmore C. PACE EH post project assessment of quality of life changes in a Florida community related to infrastructure improvements. J Environ Health. 2008;70:40–6.
  9. Lott DF, Tardiff T. Evaluation by experienced riders of a new bicycle lane in an established bikeway system. Transp Res Rec. 1979;683:40–6.

Cited by

See all 888

Metadata

Authors
Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., & Mackie, H.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
158-158
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769089735
Cited by
888
References
91
FWCI
15.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (29898)
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand (17-013)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
The paper
Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., Baas, P., & Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.