Cited by 124Urban Transport and AccessibilityAir Quality and Health ImpactsUrban Green Space and Health

Transforming Our Cities: Best Practices towards Clean Air and Active Transportation

Glazener, Andrew, Khreis, Haneen·2019·Current Environmental Health Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review By 2050, 70% of the global population will live in urban areas, exposing a greater number of people to specific city-related health risks that will only be exacerbated by climate change. Two prominent health risks are poor air quality and physical inactivity. We aim to review the literature and state the best practices for clean air and active transportation in urban areas. Recent findings Cities have been targeting reductions in air pollution and physical inactivity to improve population health. Oslo, Paris, and Madrid plan on banning cars from their city centers to mitigate climate change, reduce vehicle emissions, and increase walking and cycling. Urban streets are being redesigned to accommodate and integrate various modes of transportation to ensure individuals can become actively mobile and healthy. Investments in pedestrian, cycling, and public transport infrastructure and services can both improve air quality and support active transportation. Emerging technologies like electric and autonomous vehicles are being developed and may reduce air pollution but have limited impact on physical activity. Green spaces too can mitigate air pollution and encourage physical activity. Clean air and active transportation overlap considerably as they are both functions of mobility. The best practices of clean air and active transportation have produced impressive results, which are improved when enacted simultaneously in integrated policy packages. Further research…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40572-019-0228-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Associated environmental benefits include improved air quality with an average reduction of nitrogen dioxide concentrations up to 4%.

    “Associated environmental benefits include improved air quality with average reduction of nitrogen dioxide concentrations up to -4% [30,40,41].”
  • Studies find that the electric autonomous option results in significant reductions in NOx emissions compared with a baseline and an autonomous scenario with 30% AV market penetration.

    “These studies find that the electric autonomous option results in significant reductions in NOx emissions by comparing three scenarios, including a baseline representing current traffic conditions, an autonomous scenario with a 30% AV market penetration, and an electric autonomous scenario with 30% batteryelectric AVs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glazener, A., & Khreis, H.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M Transportation Institute (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Khreis, Haneen
Venue
Current Environmental Health Reports
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
22-37
ISSN
2196-5412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913219578
Cited by
124
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Environmental Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
urban air pollution, active travel, physical inactivity, urban health, cycling infrastructure, pedestrian infrastructure, public transport, electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, green spaces, climate change, policy integration, urban mobility
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, Vehicle Emissions, Bicycling, Cities, Humans, Transportation, Urban Population, Exercise, Walking, Motor Vehicles, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review