Cited by 34Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm Care

State of newborn care in South Sudan's displacement camps: a descriptive study of facility-based deliveries

Open access
Sami, Samira, Kerber, Kate, Kenyi, Solomon, Amsalu, Ribka, Tomczyk, Barbara, Jackson, Debra, Dimiti, Alexander, Scudder, Elaine +4 more·2017·Reproductive Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 2.7 million neonatal deaths occur annually, with highest rates of neonatal mortality in countries that have recently experienced conflict. Constant instability in South Sudan further strains a weakened health system and poses public health challenges during the neonatal period. We aimed to describe the state of newborn facility-level care in displaced person camps across Juba, Malakal, and Maban. METHODS: We conducted clinical observations of the labor and delivery period, exit interviews with recently delivered mothers, health facility assessments, and direct observations of midwife time-use. Study participants were mother-newborn pairs who sought services and birth attendants who provided delivery services between April and June 2016 in five health facilities. RESULTS: Facilities were found to be lacking the recommended medical supplies for essential newborn care. Two of the five facilities had skilled midwives working during all operating hours, with 6.2% of their time spent on postnatal care. Selected components of thermal care (62.5%), infection prevention (74.8%), and feeding support (63.6%) were commonly practiced, but postnatal monitoring (27.7%) was less consistently observed. Differences were found when comparing the primary care level to the hospital (thermal: relative risk [RR] 0.48 [95% CI] 0.40-0.58; infection: RR 1.28 [1.11-1.47]; feeding: RR 0.49 [0.40-0.58]; postnatal: RR 3.17 [2.01-5.00]). In the primary care level, relative to newborns delivered by traditional birth attendants, those delivered by skilled attendants were more likely to receive postnatal monitoring (RR 1.59 [1.09-2.32]), but other practices were not statistically different. Mothers' knowledge of danger signs was poor, with fever as the highest reported (44.8%) followed by not feeding well (41.0%), difficulty breathing (28.9%), reduced activity (27.7%), feeling cold (18.0%) and convulsions (11.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Addressing health service delivery in contexts affected by conflict is vital to reducing the global newborn mortality rate and reaching the Sustainable Development Goals. Gaps in intrapartum and postnatal care, particularly skilled care at birth, suggest a critical need to build the capacity of the existing health workforce while increasing access to skilled deliveries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12978-017-0417-z

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Inter-Agency Working Group For Reproductive Health in Crises. Inter-agency field manual on reproductive health in humanitarian settings. 2010. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/emergencies/field_manual/en/ 26203479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sami, S., Kerber, K., Kenyi, S., Amsalu, R., Tomczyk, B., Jackson, D., Dimiti, A., Scudder, E., Meyers, J., Umurungi, J. P. D. C., Kenneth, K., & Mullany, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Save the Children (US)
  • International Medical Corps (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
Corresponding author
Sami, Samira
Venue
Reproductive Health
Published
2017-11-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
161-161
ISSN
1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769893373
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives
  • The Elma Relief Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
neonatal care, institutional delivery, displaced persons camps, South Sudan, conflict-affected settings, skilled birth attendance, neonatal thermal care, infection control, neonatal danger signs, maternal knowledge, health facility assessment, health workforce capacity
MeSH terms
Infant Health, Refugee Camps, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Postnatal Care, Sudan, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review