Cited by 51Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

Living as an infertile woman: the case of southern and northern Ghana

Open access
Ofosu-Budu, Dorcas, Hanninen, Vilma·2020·Reproductive Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility is detrimental to the health of married couples, especially women. Despite the consequences associated with the condition, little is done to reduce the repercussions. This study throws more light on the lived experiences of infertile women and on how they can be helped to improve their own condition. METHODOLOGY: We interviewed 30 infertile married women in the Northern and Ashanti regions of Ghana, 15 from each region. A qualitative method, phenomenological study design and thematic analysis was employed to explore their lived experiences. RESULTS: Due the huge stigma, some women reported that their loved ones encouraged them to try to conceive. Others revealed that, they were considering relocating from their current communities to reduce the insults, intense pressure, stress, and stigma. Though some revealed maltreatment from their husbands and in-laws, others stated their husbands disclosed their fertility status to their own family members to avoid these families pressuring these women. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the stigma, pronatalist societies urgently need education and sensitization. Would-be couples should be counselled to have a plan to deal with such occurrences should they experience them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12978-020-00920-z

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Burns LH, Covington SN. Psychology of infertility. Infertil Couns. In: A comprehensive handbook for clinicians, second edition. Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 3–25.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ofosu-Budu, D., & Hanninen, V.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Ofosu-Budu, Dorcas
Venue
Reproductive Health
Published
2020-05-20
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
69-69
ISSN
1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027216767
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto kuopio kampus (Travel grant)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
female infertility, lived experience, stigma, infertile women, relocation, domestic violence, pronatalism, infertility counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Female, Ghana, Humans, Infertility, Female, Marriage, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review