The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal health: a scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic affects maternal health both directly and indirectly, and direct and indirect effects are intertwined. To provide a comprehensive overview on this broad topic in a rapid format behooving an emergent pandemic we conducted a scoping review. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to compile evidence on direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic on maternal health and provide an overview of the most significant outcomes thus far. Working papers and news articles were considered appropriate evidence along with peer-reviewed publications in order to capture rapidly evolving updates. Literature in English published from January 1st to September 11 2020 was included if it pertained to the direct or indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical, mental, economic, or social health and wellbeing of pregnant people. Narrative descriptions were written about subject areas for which the authors found the most evidence. Results: The search yielded 396 publications, of which 95 were included. Pregnant individuals were found to be at a heightened risk of more severe symptoms than people who are not pregnant. Intrauterine, vertical, and breastmilk transmission were unlikely. Labor, delivery, and breastfeeding guidelines for COVID-19 positive patients varied. Severe increases in maternal mental health issues, such as clinically relevant anxiety and depression, were reported. Domestic violence appeared to spike. Prenatal care visits decreased, healthcare infrastructure was strained, and potentially harmful policies implemented with little evidence. Women were more likely to lose their income due to the pandemic than men, and working mothers struggled with increased childcare demands. Conclusion: Pregnant women and mothers were not found to be at higher risk for COVID-19 infection than people who are not pregnant, however pregnant people with symptomatic COVID-19 may experience more adverse outcomes compared to non-pregnant people and seem to face disproportionate adverse socio-economic consequences. High income and low- and middle-income countries alike faced significant struggles. Further resources should be directed towards quality epidemiological studies. Plain English summary: The Covid-19 pandemic impacts reproductive and perinatal health both directly through infection itself but also indirectly as a consequence of changes in health care, social policy, or social and economic circumstances. The direct and indirect consequences of COVID-19 on maternal health are intertwined. To provide a comprehensive overview on this broad topic we conducted a scoping review. Pregnant women who have symptomatic COVID-19 may experience more severe outcomes than people who are not pregnant. Intrauterine and breastmilk transmission, and the passage of the virus from mother to baby during delivery are unlikely. The guidelines for labor, delivery, and breastfeeding for COVID-19 positive patients vary, and this variability could create uncertainty and unnecessary harm. Prenatal care visits decreased, healthcare infrastructure was strained, and potentially harmful policies are implemented with little evidence in high and low/middle income countries. The social and economic impact of COVID-19 on maternal health is marked. A high frequency of maternal mental health problems, such as clinically relevant anxiety and depression, during the epidemic are reported in many countries. This likely reflects an increase in problems, but studies demonstrating a true change are lacking. Domestic violence appeared to spike. Women were more vulnerable to losing their income due to the pandemic than men, and working mothers struggled with increased childcare demands. We make several recommendations: more resources should be directed to epidemiological studies, health and social services for pregnant women and mothers should not be diminished, and more focus on maternal mental health during the epidemic is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens
Wang, W., Xu, Y., Gao, R., Lu, R., Han, K., Wu, G., & Tan, W. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3786 · Cited by 5,028
Chen, H., Guo, J., Wang, C., Luo, F., Yu, X., Zhang, W., Li, J., Zhao, D., Xu, D., Gong, Q., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30360-3 · Cited by 3,919
What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v9.26152 · Cited by 3,056
Allotey, J., Fernandez, S., Bonet, M., Stallings, E., Yap, M., Kew, T., Zhou, D., Coomar, D., Sheikh, J., Lawson, H., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3320 · Cited by 2,304
The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality
Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w26947 · Cited by 1,706
Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review
Biaggi, A., Conroy, S., Pawlby, S., & Pariante, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014 · Cited by 1,657
Collaborative, C. (2020) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11746 · Cited by 1,421
Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys
Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., & Rauh, C. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245 · Cited by 1,410
Cited by
Lu, Y.-C., Andescavage, N., Wu, Y., Kapse, K., Andersen, N. R., Quistorff, J., Saeed, H., Lopez, C., Henderson, D., Barnett, S. D., et al. (2022) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-022-00111-w · Cited by 46
Goyal, L. D., Garg, P., Verma, M., Kaur, N., Bakshi, D., & Arora, J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059701 · Cited by 20
Bradford, B. F., Cronin, R. S., Popoola, T., Bright, N., & Silverio, S. A. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101622 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotlar, B., Gerson, E. M., Petrillo, S., Langer, A., & Tiemeier, H.
- Venue
- Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2021-01-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1742-4755 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124912855
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 130.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal health: a scoping review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12978-021-01070-6
- The paper
- Kotlar, B., Gerson, E. M., Petrillo, S., Langer, A., & Tiemeier, H. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal health: a scoping review. Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01070-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.