Factors influencing electronic health record system use in public health facilities in Tanzania
Open accessAbstract
Purpose This study examined the organizational, technological, and environmental factors influencing the use of electronic health record (EHR) systems in public health facilities in Tanzania. It applied the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to identify key enablers and constraints of system usage. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods approach was adopted. Quantitative data were collected from 251 healthcare workers across public facilities using structured questionnaires. Binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between TOE domains and reported EHR usage. Qualitative insights were gathered through key informant interviews with facility managers and ICT officers, and were analyzed thematically using NVivo. Results Organizational factors, particularly staff training and workflow integration, showed strong statistical associations with EHR usage. Technological factors, such as infrastructure adequacy and the availability of technical support, also emerged as significant predictors. Environmental factors, including the policy environment and donor support, were not statistically significant; however, they were highlighted in the qualitative findings as influential. The integration of results highlighted organizational readiness as the strongest determinant of consistent EHR system use in this context. Conclusions Improving EHR usage in Tanzania’s public health facilities requires prioritization of staff training, leadership support, and infrastructural readiness. While national policies and donor engagement shape the broader implementation landscape, internal facility-level factors have a stronger direct influence on uptake. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of digital health adoption in low-resource settings and offer practical recommendations for scaling EHR systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Healthcare workers in Nigeria may be interested in EHR systems in theory, but real practice is limited by context-specific factors including device unavailability, instability of institutional preparedness, and poor health informatics skills.
“Facts of scoping and quantitative research also confirm that healthcare workers might be interested in EHR systems in theory, but the real practice is limited due to the context specifics, including device unavailability, instability of institutional preparedness, and poor health informatics skills of professionals [14, 22, 23].”
From Cloud-based Electronic Health Records (EHR) Adoption Rate in Nigeria: Barriers and Performance Bottlenecks (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020) · Life · doi:10.3390/life10120327 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Mugauri, H. D., Chimsimbe, M., Shambira, G., Shamhu, S., Nyamasve, J., Munyanyi, M., Gongora, R., Zizhou, S., Gabida, M., & Makurumidze, R. (2025) · Global Health Action · doi:10.1080/16549716.2025.2492913 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
mUzima Mobile Electronic Health Record (EHR) System: Development and Implementation at Scale
Were, M. C., Savai, S., Mokaya, B., Mbugua, S., Ribeka, N., Cholli, P., & Yeung, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26381 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adoghe, O. B., Ikharo, B., & Amhenrior, H. (2026) · Research Square (preprint) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8821192/v1
- Authors
- Mwogosi, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Dodoma (TZ)
- Corresponding author
- Mwogosi, Augustino
- ORCID
- Mwogosi, Augustino
- Venue
- Discover Public Health
- Published
- 2025-11-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 3005-0774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416131745
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Discover Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, EHR adoption, public health facilities, technology-organization-environment framework, organizational readiness, employee training, workflow integration, ICT infrastructure, technical support, digital health adoption, resource-limited settings, Tanzania
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review