Cited by 42Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

A decade of designing and implementing electronic health records in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review

Open access
Mugauri, Hamufare Dumisani, Chimsimbe, Memory, Shambira, Gerald, Shamhu, Shepherd, Nyamasve, Juliet, Munyanyi, Manes, Gongora, Robert, Zizhou, Simukai +2 more·2025·Global Health Action

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems offer extensive opportunities to enhance healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries by improving data management and patient care and reducing errors. Nonetheless, EHR systems face a myriad of challenges, ranging from infrastructure and resources to policy, data management, and implementers' capacitation. This review provides a comprehensive 10-year overview of EHR implementation in the SSA region. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and HINARI databases identified 30 relevant studies published from 2014 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing the implementation, benefits, and challenges of EHR systems in SSA countries. Data extraction and thematic analysis facilitated the synthesis of findings. The review identified themes organized into four categories: EHR-enabled data management reduced errors, enhanced accuracy, and improved accessibility of patient records. Improved patient care correlated with better data management, facilitating timely and informed decision-making. Challenges such as limited infrastructure (power and connectivity), financial constraints, data privacy concerns, and the need for extensive training were prevalent. User acceptance also emerged as a critical barrier, with healthcare providers often resistant to adopting innovative technologies due to perceived complexity and the time required for training. EHR systems can significantly enhance healthcare delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. To fully realize these benefits, it is crucial to address challenges through targeted strategies and investments. By investing in reliable infrastructure, securing financial support, enhancing data security, developing comprehensive training programmes, and engaging stakeholders, sub-Saharan Africa can improve data management, patient care, and overall healthcare outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16549716.2025.2492913

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]Antor E, Owusu-Marfo J, Kissi J. Usability evaluation of electronic health records at the trauma and emergency directorates at the Komfo Anokye teaching hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [ cited 2024 Oct 24]; 24: 1– 14. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02636-7 39169338 PMC11340109 · DOI
  2. [30]Odekunle FF, Srinivasan S, Odekunle RO. Why sub-saharan Africa lags in electronic health record (EHR) adoption and possible strategies to increase EHR adoption in this region. J Health Inf Africa [Internet]. 2018 Nov 4 [ cited 2024 Oct 29]; 5: 8– 15. Available from: https://www.jhia-online.org/index.php/jhia/article/view/147

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mugauri, H. D., Chimsimbe, M., Shambira, G., Shamhu, S., Nyamasve, J., Munyanyi, M., Gongora, R., Zizhou, S., Gabida, M., & Makurumidze, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • University of Zimbabwe
  • Ministry of Health and Child Care
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
Corresponding author
Mugauri, Hamufare Dumisani
Venue
Global Health Action
Published
2025-04-29
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
2492913-2492913
ISSN
  • 1654-9716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-9880
OpenAlex
W4409903992
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 11
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Health Action (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • UNICEF Zimbabwe (ZIM/PCA2022145/PD2024487)
  • University of Zimbabwe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, EHR implementation, sub-Saharan Africa, health information systems, data management, patient care, data privacy, health professions education, user acceptance, health infrastructure
MeSH terms
Data Management, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Africa South of the Sahara, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review