CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking

Panizzolo, Fausto A., Galiana, Ignacio, Asbeck, Alan T., Siviy, Christopher, Schmidt, Kai, Holt, Kenneth G., Walsh, Conor J.·2016·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9PMC PMC4864923
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Valid baseline subtractions are necessary if effect sizes from exoskeletons, prosthetics, and other assistive devices are to be accurately quantified.

    “Because advances in exoskeletons (14, 57), prosthetics (33), and other assistive devices continue to bring about reductions in walking metabolism, valid baseline subtractions are necessary if the effect sizes resulting from these and other interventions are to be accurately quantified.”

    From Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load. (2017) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Results (Metabolic cost and muscle activity; page unavailable) report reduced metabolic power with the powered exosuit, supporting the citing sentence’s point about exoskeletons. The Methods (Metabolic cost; page unavailable) subtract standing metabolic power to calculate net walking metabolic power, but the paper does not state that valid baseline subtractions are necessary to quantify effect sizes across exoskeletons, prosthetics, and other devices. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Griffin TM, Roberts TJ, Kram R. Metabolic cost of generating muscular force in human walking: insights from load-carrying and speed experiments. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:172–83. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med. 2004;169:45–56. · DOI
  3. Huang T-WP, Kuo AD. Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:605–13. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wang H, Frame J, Ozimek E, Leib D, Dugan EL. The effects of load carriage and muscle fatigue on lower-extremity joint mechanics. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:305–12. · DOI
  5. Silder A, Delp SL, Besier T. Men and women adopt similar walking mechanics and muscle activation patterns during load carriage. J Biomech. 2013;46:2522–8. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Knapik J, Harman E, Reynolds K. Load carriage using packs: a review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Appl Ergon. 1996;27:207–16. · DOI
  7. Dollar AM, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24:144–58. · DOI
  8. Kazerooni H, Steger R. The Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2006;128:14. · DOI
  9. Walsh CJ, Endo K, Herr H. A quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. Int J Humanoid Robot. 2007;4:487–506. · DOI
  10. Garcia E, Sater J, Main J. Exoskeletons for human performance augmentation (EHPA): A program summary. J Robotics Soc Japan. 2002;20:822–6. · DOI
  11. Yamamoto K, Ishii M, Hyodo K, Yoshimitsu T, Matsuo T. Development of power assisting suit (miniaturization of supply system to realize wearable suit). JSME Int J Ser C. 2003;46:923–30. · DOI
  12. Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Powered ankle exoskeletons reveal the metabolic cost of plantar flexor mechanical work during walking with longer steps at constant step frequency. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:21–31. · DOI
  13. Banala SK, Agrawal SK, Scholz SP. Active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2007, 401–7 · DOI
  14. Kawamoto H, Lee S, Kanbe S, Sankai Y. Power assist method for HAL-3 using emg-based feedback controller. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 2003, 1648–53. · DOI
  15. Schiele A. Ergonomics of exoskeletons: Subjective performance metrics. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Rob and Sys 2009, 480–5 · DOI
  16. Browning RC, Modica JR, Kram R, Goswami A. The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:515–25. · DOI
  17. Asbeck AT, De Rossi SMM, Galiana I, Ding Y, Walsh CJ. Stronger, smarter, softer: next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2014;21:22–33. · DOI
  18. Asbeck AT, Dyer RJ, Larusson AF, Walsh CJ. Biologically-inspired soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013, 1–8 · DOI
  19. Asbeck AT, Schmidt K, Walsh CJ. Soft exosuit for hip assistance. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;73:102–10. · DOI
  20. Ding Y, Galiana I, Asbeck A, De Rossi S, Bae J, Santos RT, Araujo VL, Lee S, Holt KG, Walsh C. Biomechanical and physiological evaluation of multi-joint assistance with soft exosuits. IEEE T Neur Sys Reh. 2016;99:1. · DOI
  21. Ding Y, Galiana I, Asbeck AT, Quinlivan B, De Rossi SMM, Walsh C. Multi-joint actuation platform for lower extremity soft exosuits, IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2014, 1327–34 · DOI
  22. Asbeck AT, Schmidt K, Galiana I, Walsh C. Multi-joint soft exosuit for gait assistance, IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2015, 6197–204 · DOI
  23. Farris DJ, Sawicki GS. The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9:110–8. · DOI
  24. Asbeck AT, De Rossi S, Holt K, Walsh C. A biologically inspired soft exosuit for walking assistance. Int J Rob Res. 2015;34:744–62. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Umberger BR, Rubenson J. Understanding muscle energetics in locomotion: new modeling and experimental approaches. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2011;39:59–67. · DOI
  26. Zhang J, Cheah CC, Collins SH. Experimental comparison of torque control methods on an ankle exoskeleton during human walking. Int Conf Robot Autom 2015, 5584–9 · DOI
  27. Winter DA. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait (University of Waterloo Press. 4th ed. 2009. · DOI
  28. Brockway JM. Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1987;41:463–71.
  29. van den Bogert AJ. Exotendons for assistance of human locomotion. Biomed Eng Online. 2003;2:17. · DOI
  30. Mooney LM, Herr HM. Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:4. · DOI
  31. Collins SH, Wiggin MB, Sawicki GS. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature. 2015;10:15.
  32. Mooney LM, Rouse EJ, Herr HM. Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking during load carriage. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:80. · DOI
  33. Van Dijk W, van der Kooij H, Hekman E. A passive exoskeleton with artificial tendons: design and experimental evaluation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011, 1–6 · DOI
  34. Gregorczyk KN, Hasselquist L, Schiffman JM, Bensel CK, Obusek JP, Gutekunst DJ. Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage. Ergonomics. 2010;53:1263–75. · DOI
  35. Sawicki GS, Lewis CL, Ferris DP. It pays to have a spring in your step. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2009;37:130–8. · DOI
  36. Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:398–404. · DOI
  37. Chleboun GS, France AR, Crill MT, Braddock HK, Howell JN. In vivo measurement of fascicle length and pennation angle of the human biceps femoris muscle. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001;169:401–9. · DOI
  38. Lastayo PC, Pierotti DJ, Pifer J, Hoppeler H, Lindstedt SL. Eccentric ergometry: Increases in locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:1282–8. · DOI
  39. Jackson RW, Collins SH. An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons. J Appl Physiol. 2015;119:541–57. · DOI
  40. Farris DJ, Robertson BD, Sawicki GS. Elastic ankle exoskeletons reduce soleus muscle force but not work in human hopping. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115:579–85. · DOI
  41. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:497–525. · DOI
  42. Ding Y, Galiana I, Siviy C, Panizzolo FA, Walsh C. IMU-based iterative control for hip extension assistance with a soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2016. · DOI
  43. Lee S, Crea S, Malcolm P, Galiana I, Walsh C. Controlling negative and positive power at the ankle with a soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2016. · DOI
  44. Quinlivan B, Asbeck A, Wagner D, Ranzani T, Russo S, Walsh C. Force transfer characterization of a soft exosuit for gait assistance. ASME Int Design Eng Tech Conf & Comput Info Eng Conf 2015, V05AT08A049. · DOI
  45. Bae J, De Rossi SMM, O’Donnell K, Hendron KL, Awad LN, Teles Dos Santos TR, De Araujo VL, Ding Y, Holt KG, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. A soft exosuit for patients with stroke: feasibility study with a mobile off-board actuation unit. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2015, 131–8. · DOI
  46. Perry J, Burnfield J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function, Slack Incorporated. 2nd ed. 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Panizzolo, F. A., Galiana, I., Asbeck, A. T., Siviy, C., Schmidt, K., Holt, K. G., & Walsh, C. J.
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
1743-0003
DOI
10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9
PMC
PMC4864923
Cited by
291
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911QX-12-C-0084, W911NF-14-C-0051)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review