Cited by 20Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback

Open access
Valle, Giacomo, Strauss, Ivo, D’Anna, Edoardo, Granata, Giuseppe, Di Iorio, Riccardo, Stieglitz, Thomas, Rossini, Paolo Maria, Raspopovic, Stanisa +2 more·2020·Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that neural stimulation can be used to provide artificial sensory feedback to amputees eliciting sensations referred on the amputated hand. The temporal properties of the neural stimulation modulate aspects of evoked sensations that can be exploited in a bidirectional hand prosthesis. METHODS: We previously collected evidence that the derivative of the amplitude of the stimulation (intra-digit temporal dynamics) allows subjects to recognize object compliance and that the time delay among stimuli injected through electrodes implanted in different nerves (inter-digit temporal distance) allows to recognize object shapes. Nevertheless, a detailed characterization of the subjects' sensitivity to variations of intra-digit temporal dynamic and inter-digit temporal distance of the intraneural tactile feedback has not been executed. An exhaustive understanding of the overall potentials and limits of intraneural stimulation to deliver sensory feedback is of paramount importance to bring this approach closer and closer to the natural situation. To this aim, here we asked two trans-radial amputees to identify stimuli with different temporal characteristics delivered to the same active site (intra-digit temporal Dynamic Recognition (DR)) or between two active sites (inter-digit Temporal distance Recognition (TR)). Finally, we compared the results achieved for (simulated) TR with conceptually similar experiments with real objects with one subject. RESULTS: We found that the subjects were able to identify stimuli with temporal differences (perceptual thresholds) larger than 0.25 s for DR and larger than 0.125 s for TR, respectively. Moreover, we also found no statistically significant differences when the subjects were asked to identify three objects during simulated 'open-loop' TR experiments or real 'closed-loop' tests while controlling robotic hand. CONCLUSIONS: This study is a new step towards a more detailed analysis of the overall potentials and limits of intraneural sensory feedback. A full characterization is necessary to develop more advanced prostheses capable of restoring all lost functions and of being perceived more as a natural limb by users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12984-020-00737-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These complications have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices.

    “These events have particularly been observed in larger nerve fibers [4, 31, 32] and in chronically implanted intrafascicular devices [30, 33, 34].”

    From Directed stimulation with interfascicular interfaces for peripheral nerve stimulation (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Methods (Surgical procedure; no page available) describe intrafascicular electrodes implanted for 180 days, but do not report complications. The Background and Conclusions discuss sensory feedback and temporal sensitivity, not whether complications occur particularly in larger nerve fibers or chronically implanted devices. Searched for complications, adverse events, nerve-fiber size, and chronic implantation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 20

Authors
Valle, G., Strauss, I., D’Anna, E., Granata, G., Di Iorio, R., Stieglitz, T., Rossini, P. M., Raspopovic, S., Petrini, F. M., & Micera, S.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Roma (IT)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Petrini, Francesco Maria
  • Micera, Silvestro
Venue
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2020-08-15
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
110-110
ISSN
1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049117617
Cited by
20
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (611687)
  • Fondation Bertarelli (-)
  • nccr (-)
  • H2020 Fast Track to Innovation (870144)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
intraneural stimulation, temporal sensitivity, perceptual thresholds, object shape recognition, robotic hand
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputees, Artificial Limbs, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Hand, Humans, Middle Aged, Robotics, Touch, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review