Cited by 246Animal testing and alternativesNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Adverse outcome pathways as a tool for the design of testing strategies to support the safety assessment of emerging advanced materials at the nanoscale

Open access
Halappanavar, Sabina, van den Brule, Sybille, Nymark, Penny, Gaté, Laurent, Seidel, Carole, Valentino, Sarah, Zhernovkov, Vadim, Høgh Danielsen, Pernille +7 more·2020·Particle and Fibre Toxicology

Abstract

Toxicity testing and regulation of advanced materials at the nanoscale, i.e. nanosafety, is challenged by the growing number of nanomaterials and their property variants requiring assessment for potential human health impacts. The existing animal-reliant toxicity testing tools are onerous in terms of time and resources and are less and less in line with the international effort to reduce animal experiments. Thus, there is a need for faster, cheaper, sensitive and effective animal alternatives that are supported by mechanistic evidence. More importantly, there is an urgency for developing alternative testing strategies that help justify the strategic prioritization of testing or targeting the most apparent adverse outcomes, selection of specific endpoints and assays and identifying nanomaterials of high concern. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a systematic process that uses the available mechanistic information concerning a toxicological response and describes causal or mechanistic linkages between a molecular initiating event, a series of intermediate key events and the adverse outcome. The AOP framework provides pragmatic insights to promote the development of alternative testing strategies. This review will detail a brief overview of the AOP framework and its application to nanotoxicology, tools for developing AOPs and the role of toxicogenomics, and summarize various AOPs of relevance to inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials that are currently under various stages of development. The review also presents a network of AOPs derived from connecting all AOPs, which shows that several adverse outcomes induced by nanomaterials originate from a molecular initiating event that describes the interaction of nanomaterials with lung cells and involve similar intermediate key events. Finally, using the example of an established AOP for lung fibrosis, the review will discuss various in vitro tests available for assessing lung fibrosis and how the information can be used to support a tiered testing strategy for lung fibrosis. The AOPs and AOP network enable deeper understanding of mechanisms involved in inhalation toxicity of nanomaterials and provide a strategy for the development of alternative test methods for hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12989-020-00344-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 166 · Cited by 246

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [153]Kohonen et al. In silico capture of toxicity effects related to nanomaterials using a novel predictive toxicogenomics space tool. vol. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315614185_Abstracts_from_New_Tools_and_Approaches_for_Nanomaterial_Safety_Assessment_conference_7-9_February_2017_Malaga_Spain?channel=doi&linkId=58d56c054585153378601c3f&showFulltext=true2017.

Authors
Halappanavar, S., van den Brule, S., Nymark, P., Gaté, L., Seidel, C., Valentino, S., Zhernovkov, V., Høgh Danielsen, P., De Vizcaya, A., Wolff, H., Stöger, T., Boyadziev, A., Poulsen, S. S., Sørli, J. B., & Vogel, U.
Affiliations
  • Health Canada (CA)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité (FR)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Halappanavar, Sabina
  • Vogel, Ulla
Venue
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Published
2020-05-25
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
16-16
ISSN
1743-8977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032195143
Cited by
246
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 12
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Particle and Fibre Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Health Canadas Genomics Research and Development Initiative
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Grant No. 686098 (SmartNanoTox), Grant No. 760813 (PATROLS))
  • The Danish Centre for Nanosafety II
  • FFIKA, Focused Research Effort on Chemicals in the Working Environment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
adverse outcome pathways, nanomaterial safety, nanotoxicology, toxicogenomics, inhalation toxicity, pulmonary fibrosis, tiered testing strategy, AOP networks, molecular initiating events, key events, hazard assessment, risk assessment, alternatives to animal testing
MeSH terms
Adverse Outcome Pathways, Animals, Animal Testing Alternatives, Humans, Research Design, Toxicity Tests, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review