Cited by 100Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health and PsychiatryTreatment of Major Depression

Critical appraisal of major depression with suicidal ideation

Open access
Pompili, Maurizio·2019·Annals of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regardless of its nature, suicidal ideation, in the absence of another diagnosis, is quintessentially associated with major clinical depression. Although for the characteristics of being depressed it is reasonable to have some wish to die, there is no real attempt to understanding the suicidal mind. Clinicians are therefore often inclined to consider suicidal ideation a symptom of major depression. Yet, most depressed patients do not die by suicide, and many of them never experience suicidal ideation even in the most severe depressing scenario. At a closer look, when one works with suicidal individual, suicide appears complex and not line with the obsolete medical model. There are often warning signs for suicide, and suicidal individuals experience mental pain as a common denominator of many adverse events. CASE PRESENTATION: A case report of an entrepreneur with no previous psychiatric history describes the process of meditating suicide as a dimension overlapping the depressive disorder. Details of how this 63-year-old male developed high suicide risk are reported, and clinicians are guided into the understanding of suicide risk. CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays, clinicians are requested to provide an in-depth investigation into the suicidal mind, an assessment adjunctive to the psychiatric evaluation. A phenomenological approach may be the key to unlock the suicidal mind. Clinicians may use such tool in light of the need for the empathic understanding of human suffering as well as a paradigm shift in the care of suicidal individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12991-019-0232-8

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Esquirol JE. Des maladies mentales considérées sous les rapports médicals, hygiéniques et médico-légal (Vol. 1), Paris, J.B. Baillière. 1838, p. 639 [English translation by Hunt KE, entitled Mental Maladies: treatise on insanity [Philadelphia, 1845].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pompili, M.
Affiliations
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT)
Corresponding author
Pompili, Maurizio
Venue
Annals of General Psychiatry
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
1744-859X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947722878
Cited by
100
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, suicide risk assessment, phenomenological method, psychological suffering, empathic understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review