Cited by 240Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment and Welfare StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

The health of workers in the global gig economy

Open access
Bajwa, Uttam, Gastaldo, Denise, Di Ruggiero, Erica, Knorr, Lilian·2018·Globalization and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The "gig" economy connects consumers with contractors (or workers) through online platform businesses to perform tasks (or "gigs"). This innovation in technology provides businesses and consumers access to low-cost, on-demand labour, but gig workers' experiences are more complex. They have access to very flexible, potentially autonomous work, but also deal with challenges caused by the nature of the work, its precariousness, and their relationships with the platform businesses. Workers in the Global North and South may also experience these challenges very differently. Based on our report "Towards an Understanding of Canadian Workers in the Global Gig Economy", we present a commentary on the implications of a globalized online platform labour market on the health of gig workers in Canada and globally. MAIN BODY: Based on our scoping review of peer and grey literature, we categorized gig worker vulnerabilities in three ways: 1) occupational vulnerabilities, 2) precarity, and 3) platform-based vulnerabilities. Occupational vulnerabilities are connected to the work being performed (e.g. driving a car or computer work) and are not specific to platform labour. Precarity refers to the short-term, contingent nature of the work, characteristics that may be shared with other forms of work. Some examples of precariousness are lack of health insurance, collective bargaining, or career training and promotion. Finally, platform-based vulnerabilities are particular to the way platform labour is structured. These vulnerabilities include worker misclassification, information asymmetries, and the culture of surveillance. We suggest that, together, these vulnerabilities challenge gig workers' right to health. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the experience of gig workers around the world must be understood in the context of neoliberalism, which has increased both the globalization and precaritization of work. While gig workers share some vulnerabilities, which have important negative consequences on their health, with other workers, the platform-specific vulnerabilities of workers require further inquiry. In particular, the specific health and overall experience of gig workers in different regions of the world - with different labour policies and sociopolitical contexts for work - must be disentangled as workers in the Global North and South experience this work very differently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [5]Graham M, Hjorth I, Lehdonvirta V. Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2017. 10.1177/1024258916687250 PMC5518998 28781494 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [6]Tran M Sokas RK The gig economy and contingent work J Occup Environ Med 2017 59 63 66 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000977 PMC5374746 28244887 · DOI
  3. [7]Benach J Muntaner C Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61 276 277 10.1136/jech.2005.045237 17372284 PMC2652930 · DOI
  4. [8]Anderson DN Wheels in the head: ridesharing as monitored performance Surveill Soc 2016 14 240 258 10.24908/ss.v14i2.6018 · DOI
  5. [9]De Stefano V. The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”. Comp Labor Law Policy J. 2015. 10.2139/ssrn.2682602. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajwa, U., Gastaldo, D., Di Ruggiero, E., & Knorr, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Royal Bank of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Bajwa, Uttam
Venue
Globalization and Health
Published
2018-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
124-124
ISSN
1744-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904294034
Cited by
240
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Globalization and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (872-2016-1056)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, gig workers, employee health, platform work, precarious employment, occupational health, worker misclassification, information asymmetry, surveillance cultures, neoliberalism, precaritization, right to health, Global North and Global South, Canada
MeSH terms
Canada, Commerce, Employment, Humans, Global Health, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review