Cited by 44Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomelessness and Social IssuesMental Health Treatment and Access

A qualitative study exploring how young people perceive and experience substance use services in British Columbia, Canada

Open access
Turuba, Roxanne, Amarasekera, Anurada, Howard, Amanda Madeleine, Brockmann, Violet, Tallon, Corinne, Irving, Sarah, Mathias, Steve, Henderson, Joanna +2 more·2022·Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substance use among youth (ages 12-24) is troublesome given the increasing risk of harms associated. Even more so, substance use services are largely underutilized among youth, most only accessing support when in crisis. Few studies have explored young people's help-seeking behaviours to address substance use concerns. To address this gap, this study explored how youth perceive and experience substance use services in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: Participatory action research methods were used by partnering with BC youth (under the age of 30) from across the province who have lived and/or living experience of substance use to co-design the research protocol and materials. An initial focus group and interviews were held with 30 youth (ages 12-24) with lived and/or living experience of substance use, including alcohol, cannabis, and illicit substances. The discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using a data-driven approach. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified and separated by phase of service interaction, starting with: Prevention/Early intervention, where youth described feeling unworthy of support; Service accessibility, where youth encountered many barriers finding relevant substance use services and information; and Service delivery, where youth highlighted the importance of meeting them where they are at, including supporting those who have milder treatment needs and/or do not meet the diagnosis criteria of a substance use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a clear need to prioritize substance use prevention and early interventions specifically targeting youth and young adults. Youth and peers with lived and/or living experience should be involved in co-designing and co-delivering such programs to ensure their relevance and credibility among youth. The current disease model of care leaves many of the needs of this population unmet, calling for a more integrated youth-centred approach to address the multifarious concerns linked to young people's substance use and service outcomes and experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13011-022-00456-4

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies from British Columbia found that people who use drugs do not endorse the use of involuntary treatment.

    “Recent studies from BC have found that people who use drugs do not endorse the use of involuntary treatment, pointing instead to significant changes required to address shortcomings of the voluntary care system, including needs for expanded access to existing services and a wider range of harm reduction, early intervention, and treatment options [23,24].”

    From “Backed into a Corner”: Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results section reports that some young people feared being sent away for abstinence-based recovery, but it does not report that participants rejected involuntary treatment. The Discussion and Conclusions support the sentence’s call for better access and a broader range of youth substance-use services. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People who use drugs point to significant changes required to address shortcomings of the voluntary care system, including expanded access to existing services and a wider range of harm reduction, early intervention, and treatment options.

    “Recent studies from BC have found that people who use drugs do not endorse the use of involuntary treatment, pointing instead to significant changes required to address shortcomings of the voluntary care system, including needs for expanded access to existing services and a wider range of harm reduction, early intervention, and treatment options [23,24].”

    From “Backed into a Corner”: Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion reports that youth described barriers to accessing substance use services and calls for greater capacity and earlier access. The Results also describe youths’ preference for flexible, non-abstinence-based care. The paper does not establish that people who use drugs generally reject involuntary treatment, or that participants specifically called for a wider range of harm-reduction options; its findings concern young people in BC. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turuba, R., Amarasekera, A., Howard, A. M., Brockmann, V., Tallon, C., Irving, S., Mathias, S., Henderson, J., Marchand, K., & Barbic, S.
Affiliations
  • Providence Health Care (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Turuba, Roxanne
Venue
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Published
2022-05-28
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
43-43
ISSN
1747-597X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281853969
Cited by
44
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Collections
Funders
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent substance use, substance use services, help-seeking, access to services, service delivery, prevention and early intervention, co-design, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, illicit substances, British Columbia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, British Columbia, Child, Humans, Peer Group, Focus Groups, Substance-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review