The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economic evaluation of implementation strategies in health care
Open accessAbstract
Economic evaluations can inform decisions about the efficiency and allocation of resources to implementation strategies-strategies explicitly designed to inform care providers and patients about the best available research evidence and to enhance its use in their practices. These strategies are increasingly popular in health care, especially in light of growing concerns about quality of care and limits on resources. But such concerns have hardly motivated health authorities and other decision-makers to spend on some form of economic evaluation in their assessments of implementation strategies. This editorial addresses the importance of economic evaluation in the context of implementation science-particularly, how these analyses can be most efficiently incorporated into decision-making processes about implementation strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“its application within improvement and implementation evaluative research remains relatively limited [1].”
From Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C. R., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M. P., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462305290190 · Cited by 864
Full Coverage for Preventive Medications after Myocardial Infarction
Choudhry, N. K., Avorn, J., Glynn, R. J., Antman, E. M., Schneeweiß, S., Toscano, M., Reisman, L., Fernandes, J. F., Spettell, C. M., Lee, J. L.-Y., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1107913 · Cited by 745
Davies, P., Walker, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-14 · Cited by 619
Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice
Grol, R. P. T. M., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., Davis, D., & Wensign, M. (2005) · Cited by 553
Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care
(2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118525975 · Cited by 506
The Value of Implementation and the Value of Information: Combined and Uneven Development
Fenwick, E. A. L., Claxton, K., & Sculpher, M. J. (2007) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x07308751 · Cited by 172
Changing professional practice: Theory and practice of clinical guidelines implementation
Thorsen, T., & Mākelä, M. (1999) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 115
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda
Powell, B. J., Fernandez, M. E., Williams, N. J., Aarons, G. A., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., McHugh, S. M., & Weiner, B. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003 · Cited by 775
Lau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B. N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., Everitt, H., Kennedy, A., Qureshi, N., Rogers, A., et al. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009993 · Cited by 254
“They also found that studies on implementation strategies tend to assess only their effect on practice and health outcomes, and very few conducted economic evaluations.(103)”
BackgroundBeidas, R. S., Dorsey, S., Lewis, C. C., Lyon, A. R., Powell, B. J., Purtle, J., Saldana, L., Shelton, R. C., Stirman, S. W., & Lane-Fall, M. B. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01226-3 · Cited by 230
Eisman, A. B., Kilbourne, A. M., Dopp, A. R., Saldana, L., & Eisenberg, D. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.008 · Cited by 210
Roberts, S. L. E., Healey, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0901-7 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoomans, T., & Severens, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hoomans, Ties
- ORCID
- Severens, Johan L
- Venue
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 168-168
- ISSN
- 1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4279808
- OpenAlex
- W1968538166
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- economic evaluation, implementation strategies, healthcare decision-making, resource allocation, evidence-based practice, quality of care, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Data Collection, Decision Support Techniques, Delivery of Health Care, Health Plan Implementation, Health Policy, Humans, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
