Cited by 10Medicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics ResearchBone fractures and treatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

The effect of aqueous extract of Prunus dulcis on tibial bone healing in the rabbit

Open access
Anaraki, Nima, Beyraghi, Amir Hossein, Raisi, Abbas, Davoodi, Farshid, Farjanikish, Ghasem, Sadegh, Amin Bigham·2021·Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone fractures are medical emergencies that require prompt intervention to help return bone to its normal function. Various methods and treatments have been utilized to increase the speed and efficiency of bone repair. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effects of Prunus dulcis aqueous extract on tibial bone healing in rabbits. METHODS: doses of Prunus dulcis extract, and osteocare treated group. Biochemical blood factors including calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase (on days 0, 10, 30, and 50), biomarkers of oxidative stress such as GPx, CAT, and MDA (on days 10 and 30), radiological evaluation, histopathological parameters, and osteocalcin immunohistochemical expression were assessed. RESULTS: The data showed calcium levels in the treatment groups increased significantly from day 10 to day 50, respectively, and blood phosphorus levels decreased from day 10 to day 50 in the treatment groups. Alkaline phosphatase initially increased and then decreased in treatment groups. In the treatment groups, GPx and CAT levels significantly increased, and the serum amount of MDA reduced. The best antioxidant results were related to the extract-treated group with a higher dose. Radiographic score was significantly higher in the treatment groups than the control group on day 30. Based on the pathological findings, the healing occurred faster in the extract-treated group with a higher dose. Osteocalcin expression was significantly higher in the control group than that in the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Prunus dulcis extract with a dosage of 300 mg/kg accelerated tibial bone healing in rabbits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13018-021-02498-z

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For irisin, tumeric acid, aqueous extract of Prunus dulcis, and the Chinese herbal formula 'Zhèng Gŭ Zĭ Jīn Dān', acceleration of fracture healing has not yet been shown in clinical studies with patients and appropriate study design.

    “Aditionally, irisin (119), tumeric acid (120), aqueous extract of Prunus dulcis (121), and the Chinese acupuncture and herbal formula powder prescription ‘Zhèng Gŭ Zĭ Jīn Dān’ (122) are thought to accelerate fracture healing, but this has not yet been shown in clinical studies with patients and with an appropriate study design.”

    From Methods to accelerate fracture healing – a narrative review from a clinical perspective (2024) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Abstract Conclusions report accelerated tibial bone healing with 300 mg/kg Prunus dulcis extract in rabbits, and the Methods confirm this was an animal study, not a clinical study with patients. The paper does not establish the broader claim that acceleration has not yet been shown in any appropriately designed clinical study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anaraki, N., Beyraghi, A. H., Raisi, A., Davoodi, F., Farjanikish, G., & Sadegh, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Lorestan University (IR)
  • Shiraz University (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Raisi, Abbas
  • Davoodi, Farshid
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2021-06-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
362-362
ISSN
1749-799X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3171778743
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Medicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
almond, aqueous plant extract, fracture healing, osteocalcin, oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes, alkaline phosphatase, calcium and phosphorus levels, bone regeneration, herbal medicine
MeSH terms
Prunus dulcis, Animals, Antioxidants, Bone Regeneration, Male, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Rabbits, Tibia, Tibial Fractures, Water, Wound Healing, Osteocalcin, Oxidative Stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review