Cited by 83Tuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerEpilepsy research and treatment

Efficacy and safety of mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin and its analogues) for tuberous sclerosis complex: a meta-analysis

Open access
Li, Min, Zhou, Ying, Chen, Chaoyang, Yang, Ting, Zhou, Shuang, Chen, Shuqing, Wu, Ye, Cui, Yimin·2019·Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) using mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors is clinically promising. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mTOR inhibitors for improving the clinical symptoms of TSC. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and WanFang, CNKI, and VIP databases) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized studies from the date of database inception to November 2017; the Chinese Food and Drug Administration and clinicaltrials.gov were also searched for unpublished studies. The endpoints of the study were the tumor response rate and seizure frequency response rate (the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction relative to the baseline). Two researchers screened articles, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data independently. The included RCTs were analyzed using RevMan 5.3, which was provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo, mTOR inhibitors significantly reduced tumor volume in both angiomyolipoma (AML) (RR = 24.69, 95% CI = 3.51,173.41, P = 0.001) and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) (RR = 27.85, 95% CI = 1.74,444.82, P = 0.02). Compared with the placebo, mTOR inhibitors significantly reduced seizure frequency (RR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.41,3.19, P = 0.0003). Regarding safety, compared with patients who did not receive mTOR inhibitors, those who did had a higher risk of suffering stomatitis (RR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.49,6.86, P = 0.003). In contrast, patients who did and did not receive mTOR inhibitors experienced similar adverse events, such as upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.81,1.45, P = 0.59) and nasopharyngitis (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.60,1.21, P = 0.38). CONCLUSION: In view of the efficacy and safety associated with tumor and seizure frequency in the TSC patients, mTOR inhibitors is a good therapeutic choice. Unlike the risks of upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, mTOR inhibitors seem to increase the risk of stomatitis, mostly grade 1 and 2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13023-019-1012-x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rapamycin has been extensively utilized for transplant rejection prophylaxis and graft-versus-host disease, as well as seizure control and reduction of tumors in tuberous sclerosis complex patients.

    “Rapamycin has been extensively utilized for transplant rejection prophylaxis and graft-versus-host disease, as well as seizure control and reduction of tumors in tuberous sclerosis complex patients [499–501].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Yan X. Clinical effect and safety analysis of rapamycin in the treatment of tuberous sclerosis with epilepsy in children. World Latest Med Inf Dig. 2016;16(72):176.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Zhou, Y., Chen, C., Yang, T., Zhou, S., Chen, S., Wu, Y., & Cui, Y.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Cui, Yimin
Venue
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
39-39
ISSN
1750-1172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922550783
Cited by
83
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Development Center for Medical Science and Technology, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China (2018ZX09721003-008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
tuberous sclerosis complex, mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin analogs, angiomyolipoma, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, seizure frequency, tumor response, stomatitis, adverse events, drug safety, drug efficacy, pediatric neurology, epilepsy, seizure frequency reduction
MeSH terms
Humans, Tuberous Sclerosis, Sirolimus, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review