Cited by 103Frailty in Older AdultsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Emergency surgery in the elderly: the balance between function, frailty, fatality and futility

Open access
Søreide, Kjetil, Desserud, Kari F·2015·Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Becoming old is considered a privilege and results from the socioeconomic progress and improvements in health care systems worldwide. However, morbidity and mortality increases with age, and even more so in acute onset disease. With the current prospects of longevity, a considerable number of elderly patients will continue to live with good function and excellent quality of life after emergency surgical care. However, mortality in emergency surgery may be reported at 15-30%, doubled if associated with complications, and notably higher in patients over 75 years. A number of risks associated with death are reported, and a number of scores proposed for prediction of risk. Frailty, a decline in the physiological reserves that may make the person vulnerable to even the most minor of stressful event, appears to be a valid indicator and predictor of risk and poor outcome, but how to best address and measure frailty in the emergency setting is not clear. Futility may sometimes be clearly defined, but most often becomes a borderline decision between ethics, clinical predictions and patient communication for which no solid evidence currently exists. The number and severity of other underlying condition(s), as well as the treatment alternatives and their consequences, is a complex picture to interpret. Add in the onset of the acute surgical disease as a further potential detrimental factor on function and quality of life - and you have a perfect storm to handle. In this brief review, some of the challenging aspects related to emergency surgery in the elderly will be discussed. More research, including registries and trials, are needed for improved knowledge to a growing health care challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13049-015-0099-x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elderly, frail, and very co-morbid patients may not be surgical candidates, nor candidates for active intervention.

    “Elderly, frail, and very co-morbid patients may not be surgical candidates, nor candidates for active intervention.”

    From Acute mesenteric ischaemia (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    In “Strategies for optimal care” (page unavailable), the paper says patients unlikely to benefit from or tolerate surgery should be considered for other treatment options. It also says aggressive life-prolonging care can do more harm than good in some cases. This supports the possibility that surgery is inappropriate, but not the broader suggestion that such patients may be candidates for no active intervention: the paper discusses less invasive treatment and palliation instead. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Søreide, K., & Desserud, K. F.
Affiliations
Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Søreide, Kjetil
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published
2015-02-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
10-10
ISSN
1757-7241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109776710
Cited by
103
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
emergency surgery, elderly patients, frailty, postoperative mortality, risk scoring, futility, quality of life, geriatric surgery, patient communication, acute surgical diseases
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Geriatric Assessment, Frail Elderly, Hospital Mortality, Medical Futility, Recovery of Function, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review