Cited by 14Child Abuse and Related TraumaChild Abuse and TraumaHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The impact of an educational program on recognition, treatment and report of child abuse

Open access
Ferrara, Pietro, Gatto, Antonio, Manganelli, Nunzia Pia, Ianniello, Francesca, Amodeo, Maria Elisa, Amato, Maria, Giardino, Ida, Chiaretti, Antonio·2017·Italian Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians play a crucial role in the identification and management of child abuse and neglect (CAN) but they often don't have a formal specialized training. METHODS: We analysed retrospectively data about patients, 0 - 18 years of age, victims of CAN between 1 April 2005 and 30 April 2015. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary educational program, "CAN: prevention strategies, individuation and treatment", on the knowledge, case recognition, treatment and follow-up of physicians of Gemelli University Hospital in Rome, regarding physical, sexual abuse and neglect. This program, in 3 different editions biannually, respectively in May-July 2010, November-January 2012 and February-May 2014, was based on 4 sessions, each one of 2 days. RESULTS: Considering the number of victims of CAN between 2005 and 2015 we observed 66 cases of maltreatment. We divided the study population in 2 groups: group A, before the educational programs, patients evaluated from 1 April 2005 to 30 July 2010; group B, after the educational program from 1 August 2010 to 30 April 2015. We observed 23 children in group A and 43 children in group B with an improvement of 87%. Analyzing our data about sex, nationality, type of perpetrators, we found that: 37/66 (56%) of children were females compared to 29/66 (44%) males; 41/66 (62%) of children came from Italy compared to 25/66 (38%) of foreign children; 52/66 (79%) of the perpetrators of abuse were parents or family members compared to acquaintances 10/66 (15%) and to strangers 4/66 (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the prevalence of CAN, the need to develop clinically competent clinicians and the improving of residency education in child maltreatment is imperative. Improving the clinical skills of pediatricians to identify and evaluate CAN may lead to reduce morbidity and mortality of these children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13052-017-0389-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training on child abuse of all types increases identification and reporting by pediatricians, nurses, and teachers.

    “Our findings align with studies suggesting that training on child abuse of all types increases identification and reporting by pediatricians, nurses, and teachers (Ferrara et al., 2017; Fraser et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2012).”

    From Child abuse prevention education policies increase reports of child sexual abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Ferrara et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says child-abuse-and-neglect training for pediatricians was associated with increased identification, and recommends training that covers neglect and domestic violence as well as physical and sexual abuse. It recommends training physicians to identify and report suspected abuse, but does not show increased reporting or establish this effect for nurses or teachers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrara, P., Gatto, A., Manganelli, N. P., Ianniello, F., Amodeo, M. E., Amato, M., Giardino, I., & Chiaretti, A.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • University of Foggia (IT)
Corresponding author
Ferrara, Pietro
Venue
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2017-08-14
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
72-72
ISSN
  • 1720-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1824-7288
OpenAlex
W2746165274
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Italian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
child abuse, pediatrician training, educational programs, case recognition, child abuse reporting, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, offender characteristics, resident education, child abuse treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Education, Humans, Infant, Italy, Male, Parents, Preventive Health Services, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Risk Assessment, Mandatory Reporting, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review