Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative metagenomics reveals unique gut microbiome biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis

Open access
Wen, Chengping, Zheng, Zhijun, Shao, Tiejuan, Liu, Lin, Xie, Zhijun, Le Chatelier, Emmanuelle, He, Zhixing, Zhong, Wendi, Fan, Yongsheng, Zhang, Linshuang, Li, Haichang, Wu, Chunyan, Hu, Changfeng, Xu, Qian, Zhou, Jia, Cai, Shunfeng, Wang, Dawei, Huang, Yun, Breban, Maxime, Qin, Nan, Ehrlich, Stanislav Dusko·2017·Genome Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment and characterization of the gut microbiome has become a focus of research in the area of human autoimmune diseases. Ankylosing spondylitis is an inflammatory autoimmune disease and evidence showed that ankylosing spondylitis may be a microbiome-driven disease. RESULTS: To investigate the relationship between the gut microbiome and ankylosing spondylitis, a quantitative metagenomics study based on deep shotgun sequencing was performed, using gut microbial DNA from 211 Chinese individuals. A total of 23,709 genes and 12 metagenomic species were shown to be differentially abundant between ankylosing spondylitis patients and healthy controls. Patients were characterized by a form of gut microbial dysbiosis that is more prominent than previously reported cases with inflammatory bowel disease. Specifically, the ankylosing spondylitis patients demonstrated increases in the abundance of Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella copri, and Prevotella sp. C561 and decreases in Bacteroides spp. It is noteworthy that the Bifidobacterium genus, which is commonly used in probiotics, accumulated in the ankylosing spondylitis patients. Diagnostic algorithms were established using a subset of these gut microbial biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of the gut microbiome are associated with development of ankylosing spondylitis. Our data suggest biomarkers identified in this study might participate in the pathogenesis or development process of ankylosing spondylitis, providing new leads for the development of new diagnostic tools and potential treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-017-1271-6

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Wen, C., Zheng, Z., Shao, T., Liu, L., Xie, Z., Le Chatelier, E., He, Z., Zhong, W., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., Li, H., Wu, C., Hu, C., Xu, Q., Zhou, J., Cai, S., Wang, D., Huang, Y., Breban, M., Qin, N., & Ehrlich, S. D.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2017-07-27
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
142-142
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2741860025
Cited by
382
References
48
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative metagenomics reveals unique gut microbiome biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13059-017-1271-6
The paper
Wen, C., Zheng, Z., Shao, T., Liu, L., Xie, Z., Le Chatelier, E., He, Z., Zhong, W., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., Li, H., Wu, C., Hu, C., Xu, Q., Zhou, J., Cai, S., Wang, D., Huang, Y., Breban, M., . . . Ehrlich, S. D. (2017). Quantitative metagenomics reveals unique gut microbiome biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1271-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.