Cited by 38Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and DynamicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment

Open access
Ruperti, Fabian, Papadopoulos, Nikolaos, Musser, Jacob M., Mirdita, Milot, Steinegger, Martin, Arendt, Detlev·2023·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Protein annotation is a major goal in molecular biology, yet experimentally determined knowledge is typically limited to a few model organisms. In non-model species, the sequence-based prediction of gene orthology can be used to infer protein identity; however, this approach loses predictive power at longer evolutionary distances. Here we propose a workflow for protein annotation using structural similarity, exploiting the fact that similar protein structures often reflect homology and are more conserved than protein sequences. Results: We propose a workflow of openly available tools for the functional annotation of proteins via structural similarity ( MorF : Mor pholog F inder) and use it to annotate the complete proteome of a sponge. Sponges are highly relevant for inferring the early history of animals, yet their proteomes remain sparsely annotated. MorF accurately predicts the functions of proteins with known homology in $${>}90\%$$ > 90 % cases and annotates an additional $$50\%$$ 50 % of the proteome beyond standard sequence-based methods. We uncover new functions for sponge cell types, including extensive FGF, TGF, and Ephrin signaling in sponge epithelia, and redox metabolism and control in myopeptidocytes. Notably, we also annotate genes specific to the enigmatic sponge mesocytes, proposing they function to digest cell walls. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that structural similarity is a powerful approach that complements and extends sequence similarity searches to identify homologous proteins over long evolutionary distances. We anticipate this will be a powerful approach that boosts discovery in numerous -omics datasets, especially for non-model organisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-023-02942-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruperti, F., Papadopoulos, N., Musser, J. M., Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., & Arendt, D.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Arendt, Detlev
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2023-05-12
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
113-113
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W4376278240
Cited by
38
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (101031984/DeCoDe Platy, No. 764840/IGNITE)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2020M3-A9G7-103933, 2021-R1C1-C102065, 2021-M3A9-I4021220)
  • H2020 European Research Council (788921/NeuralCellTypeEvo)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein annotation, structural similarity, non-model organisms, MORF, protein structure prediction, protein sequence alignment, FGF signaling, TGF signaling, ephrin signaling, redox metabolism, cell wall digestion, early animal evolution
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Proteome, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review