The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of the isoelectric point (pI) based on the amino acid sequence is useful for many analytical biochemistry and proteomics techniques such as 2-D polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, or capillary isoelectric focusing used in combination with high-throughput mass spectrometry. Additionally, pI estimation can be helpful during protein crystallization trials. RESULTS: Here, I present the Isoelectric Point Calculator (IPC), a web service and a standalone program for the accurate estimation of protein and peptide pI using different sets of dissociation constant (pKa) values, including two new computationally optimized pKa sets. According to the presented benchmarks, the newly developed IPC pKa sets outperform previous algorithms by at least 14.9 % for proteins and 0.9 % for peptides (on average, 22.1 % and 59.6 %, respectively), which corresponds to an average error of the pI estimation equal to 0.87 and 0.25 pH units for proteins and peptides, respectively. Moreover, the prediction of pI using the IPC pKa's leads to fewer outliers, i.e., predictions affected by errors greater than a given threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The IPC service is freely available at http://isoelectric.ovh.org Peptide and protein datasets used in the study and the precalculated pI for the PDB and some of the most frequently used proteomes are available for large-scale analysis and future development. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Frank Eisenhaber and Zoltán Gáspári.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative functional genomics analysis of cytochrome P450 gene superfamily in wheat and maize
Li, Y., & Wei, K. (2020) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-020-2288-7 · Cited by 119
cGLRs are a diverse family of pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity
(2023) · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.038 · Cited by 117
Kuras, M., Woldmar, N., Kim, Y., Hefner, M., Malm, J., Moldvay, J., Döme, B., Fillinger, J., Pizzatti, L., Gil, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00850 · Cited by 36
Xu, S., & Onoda, A. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01288 · Cited by 13
Stuart, W. S., Jenkins, C. H., Ireland, P. M., Isupov, M. N., Norville, I. H., & Harmer, N. J. (2025) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108517 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozlowski, L. P.
- Venue
- Biology Direct
- Published
- 2016-10-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-55
- ISSN
- 1745-6150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951852411
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13062-016-0159-9
- The paper
- Kozlowski, L. P. (2016). IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator. Biology Direct. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0159-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.