Accurate and Rapid Prediction of Protein p K a : Protein Language Models Reveal the Sequence–p K a Relationship
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein p K a prediction is a key challenge in computational biology. In this study, we present pKALM, a novel deep learning-based method for high-throughput protein p K a prediction. pKALM uses a protein language model (PLM) to capture the complex sequence–structure relationships of proteins. While traditionally considered a structure-based problem, our results show that a PLM pretrained on large-scale protein sequence databases can effectively learn this relationship and achieve state-of-the-art performance. pKALM accurately predicts the p K a values of six residues (Asp, Glu, His, Lys, Cys, and Tyr) and two termini with high precision and efficiency. It performs well at predicting both exposed and buried residues, which often deviate from standard p K a values measured in the solvent. We demonstrate a novel finding that predicted protein isoelectric points (pI) can be used to improve the accuracy of p K a prediction. High-throughput p K a prediction of the human proteome using pKALM achieves a speed of 4,965 p K a predictions per second, which is several orders of magnitude faster than existing state-of-the-art methods. The case studies illustrate the efficacy of pKALM in estimating p K a values and the constraints of the method. pKALM will thus be a valuable tool for researchers in the fields of biochemistry, biophysics, and drug design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · Cited by 3,286 · see citing works
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/622803 · Cited by 3,280 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning
Alley, E. C., Khimulya, G., Biswas, S., AlQuraishi, M., & Church, G. M. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Protein p <i>K</i> <sub>a</sub> Prediction by Tree-Based Machine Learning
Chen, A. Y., Lee, J., Damjanovic, A., & Brooks, B. R. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01257 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wozniak, S., Janson, G., & Feig, M. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01682 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xu, S., & Onoda, A.
- Affiliations
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Onoda, Akira
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2025-03-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3752-3764
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W4408853280
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hokkaido University (JPMJSP2119)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP24A202, JP24H02213, JP24K01533)
- Japan International Cooperation Agency (JPMJSA2206)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein language models, sequence-structure relationship, isoelectric point, buried residues, human proteome, high-throughput prediction, charged amino acids
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Isoelectric Point, Proteins, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review