Cited by 67Research Data Management PracticesEthics in Clinical ResearchAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Sharing data from clinical trials: The rationale for a controlled access approach

Open access
Sydes, Matthew R, Johnson, Anthony L, Meredith, Sarah K, Rauchenberger, Mary, South, Annabelle, Parmar, Mahesh KB·2015·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The move towards increased transparency around clinical trials is welcome. Much focus has been on under-reporting of trials and access to individual patient data to allow independent verification of findings. There are many other good reasons for data sharing from clinical trials. We describe some key issues in data sharing, including the challenges of open access to data. These include issues in consent and disclosure; risks in identification, including self-identification; risks in distorting data to prevent self-identification; and risks in analysis. These risks have led us to develop a controlled access policy, which safeguards the rights of patients entered in our trials, guards the intellectual property rights of the original researchers who designed the trial and collected the data, provides a barrier against unnecessary duplication, and ensures that researchers have the necessary resources and skills to analyse the data. METHODS: We briefly discuss the practicalities of our current approach to data sharing, including ensuring that data are discoverable and how to deal with old studies. We describe data sharing activities at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit. RESULTS: One hundred and three data sharing activities were logged from 2012 to 2014 from external and internal applicants. The motivations are varied, but none have been for replication of the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: For any request to share data, we note the important role of independent reviewers as well as reviewers who know the study well, and present some of the key questions that all reviewers should ask when deciding whether a request is reasonable. We consider the responsibilities of all parties. We highlight the potential for opportunity costs. Clinical trial data should be shared for reasonable requests but there are many practical issues that must be explicitly considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Institute of Medicine. Discussion framework for clinical trial data sharing: guiding principles, elements, and activities. London: The National Academies Press; 2014. 25392895
  2. [19]Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on Strategies for Responsible Sharing of Clinical Trial Data, editor Sharing clinical trials data: maximizing benefits, minimizing risks 2015 Washington DC, USA National Academies Press 25590113

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sydes, M. R., Johnson, A. L., Meredith, S. K., Rauchenberger, M., South, A., & Parmar, M. K.
Affiliations
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
Corresponding author
Sydes, Matthew R
Venue
Trials
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
104-104
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130462624
Cited by
67
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
20.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12023/24)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
clinical trial data sharing, controlled access, individual patient data, data access policy, patient consent, data anonymization, intellectual property, data discoverability, opportunity cost
MeSH terms
Data Anonymization, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Informed Consent, Policy Making, Research Design, Databases, Factual, Access to Information, Disclosure, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review