Cited by 16Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesToxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins

Efficacy of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial (MISTRAL)

Open access
Wode, Kathrin, Hök Nordberg, Johanna, Kienle, Gunver S., Elander, Nils O., Bernhardson, Britt-Marie, Sunde, Berit, Sharp, Lena, Henriksson, Roger +1 more·2020·Trials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Most pancreatic cancer patients present with advanced stage at diagnosis with extremely short expected survival and few treatment options. A multimodal palliative approach is necessary for symptom relief and optimisation of health-related quality of life. In a recent open-label trial of mistletoe extract for advanced pancreatic cancer patients not eligible for chemotherapy, promising results on improved overall survival and better health-related quality of life were reported. The objective of the present study is to assess the value of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment (palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with regard to overall survival and health-related quality of life. Methods: The trial is prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group and placebo-controlled. In total, 290 participants are randomly assigned to placebo or mistletoe extract given subcutaneously in increasing dosage from 0.01 to 20 mg three times per week for 9 months. Stratification is performed for site and palliative chemotherapy. Main inclusion criteria are advanced pancreatic cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2; main exclusion criteria are life expectancy less than 4 weeks and neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas. Two ancillary studies on sub-sets of participants are nested in the trial: a biomarker study collecting blood samples and a cross-sectional qualitative study with semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first placebo-controlled randomised trial assessing the impact of mistletoe extract as a complement to standard treatment on overall survival and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The presented trial with its two nested ancillary studies exploring biomarkers and patient experiences is expected to give new insights into the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT Number 2014-004552-64 . Registered on 19 January 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02948309 . Registered on 28 October 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-020-04581-y

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wode, K., Hök Nordberg, J., Kienle, G. S., Elander, N. O., Bernhardson, B.-M., Sunde, B., Sharp, L., Henriksson, R., & Fransson, P.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
Corresponding author
Wode, Kathrin
Venue
Trials
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
783-783
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3086700838
Cited by
16
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Onkologklinikens Gåvofond; Karolinska University Hospital (K0777-2011)
  • The Cancer Research Funds of Radiumhemmet (134182)
  • Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö (May 2018, May 2014, May 2020)
  • Ekhaga foundation (2016-84)
  • Dagmar Ferbs Memorial fund (June 2014)
  • Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden (AMP16-816)
  • The Sjoberg Foundation (Date 2 Jan 2019)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
Keywords
mistletoe extract, advanced pancreatic cancer, palliative chemotherapy, best supportive care, overall survival, health-related quality of life, complementary therapy, subcutaneous administration, biomarkers, patient experience, palliative care
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Plant Extracts, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Mistletoe, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review