Cited by 144Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Recurrent de novo mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders: properties and clinical implications

Open access
Wilfert, Amy B., Sulovari, Arvis, Turner, Tychele N., Coe, Bradley P., Eichler, Evan E.·2017·Genome Medicine

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is now more accessible to clinicians and researchers. As a result, our understanding of the genetics of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) has rapidly advanced over the past few years. NGS has led to the discovery of new NDD genes with an excess of recurrent de novo mutations (DNMs) when compared to controls. Development of large-scale databases of normal and disease variation has given rise to metrics exploring the relative tolerance of individual genes to human mutation. Genetic etiology and diagnosis rates have improved, which have led to the discovery of new pathways and tissue types relevant to NDDs. In this review, we highlight several key findings based on the discovery of recurrent DNMs ranging from copy number variants to point mutations. We explore biases and patterns of DNM enrichment and the role of mosaicism and secondary mutations in variable expressivity. We discuss the benefit of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) over whole-exome sequencing (WES) to understand more complex, multifactorial cases of NDD and explain how this improved understanding aids diagnosis and management of these disorders. Comprehensive assessment of the DNM landscape across the genome using WGS and other technologies will lead to the development of novel functional and bioinformatics approaches to interpret DNMs and drive new insights into NDD biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13073-017-0498-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In all human chromosomal aberration syndromes, including trisomies, monosomies, polyploidies, disomies and imprinting errors or sex chromosome anomalies, structural abnormalities of (pre)frontal as well as many other areas are common.

    “In all human chromosomal aberration syndromes, including trisomies, monosomies (e.g., Turner syndrome, monosomy 1p36), polyploidies, disomies and imprinting errors or sex chromosome anomalies, structural abnormalities of (pre)frontal as well as many other areas are common [61, 288–292].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [289]

    The Copy number variation section discusses genomic disorders and CNVs, but does not describe brain anatomy across the listed chromosomal syndromes. The Functional gene networks and tissue enrichments section mentions abnormal striatal structure in ASD studies and rodent models, not common (pre)frontal abnormalities in all chromosomal aberration syndromes. Searches for prefrontal anatomy, trisomies, monosomies, polyploidies, disomies, and imprinting found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 140 · Cited by 144

Authors
Wilfert, A. B., Sulovari, A., Turner, T. N., Coe, B. P., & Eichler, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Eichler, Evan E.
Venue
Genome Medicine
Published
2017-11-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
101-101
ISSN
1756-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770738909
Cited by
144
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Simons Foundation (SFARI 303241, 303241)
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI 303241, 303241)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01MH10221)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101221)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG000035)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
neurodevelopmental disorders, copy number variation, point mutations, mosaicism, variable expressivity, secondary mutations, whole genome sequencing, exome sequencing, genetic diagnosis, mutation tolerance, disease gene discovery
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Humans, Mutation, DNA Copy Number Variations, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review