Cited by 396Medicine, History, and PhilosophyClinical practice guidelines implementationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Medicine in the early twenty-first century: paradigm and anticipation - EPMA position paper 2016

Open access
Golubnitschaja, Olga, Baban, Babak, Boniolo, Giovanni, Wang, Wei, Bubnov, Rostyslav, Kapalla, Marko, Krapfenbauer, Kurt, Mozaffari, Mahmood S. +1 more·2016·EPMA Journal

Abstract

Challenges of “standardisation” and “individualisation” have always been characteristic for medical services. In terms of individualisation, the best possible individual care is the ethical imperative of medicine, and it is a good right of any patient to receive it. However, in terms of standardisation, all the available treatments are based on guideline recommendations derived from large multi-centre trials with many thousands of patients involved. In the most optimal way, the standardisation and individualisation should go hand-in-hand, in order to identify the right patient treating him/her with the right medication and the right dose at the right time point! Further, in paradigm and anticipation, there is a big discrepancy between “disease care” and “health care” which dramatically impacts ethical and economical aspects of medical services. Several approaches have been suggested in ancient and modern medicine to conduct medical services in a possibly optimal way. What is the difference amongst all of them and how big is the potential beyond corresponding approach to satisfy the needs of the individual, the patient, professional groups involved and society at large? On behalf of the “European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine,” the dedicated EPMA working group provides a deep analysis in the issue followed by the expert recommendations considering the multifaceted aspects of both “disease care” and “health care” practices including ethics and economy, life quality of individuals and patients, interests of professional groups involved, benefits of subpopulations, health care system(s) and society as a whole.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13167-016-0072-4

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golubnitschaja, O., Baban, B., Boniolo, G., Wang, W., Bubnov, R., Kapalla, M., Krapfenbauer, K., Mozaffari, M. S., & Costigliola, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
Corresponding author
Golubnitschaja, Olga
Venue
EPMA Journal
Published
2016-10-25
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
23-23
ISSN
  • 1878-5077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5085
OpenAlex
W2532686299
Cited by
396
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The EPMA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
predictive medicine, preventive medicine, personalized medicine, standardization of care, medical ethics, health economics, quality of life, patient needs, professional groups, health care system, subpopulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review