Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of severe COVID-19 with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

Open access
Shu, Lei, Niu, Changming, Li, Ruyou, Huang, Tingrong, Wang, Yan, Huang, Mao, Ji, Ningfei, Zheng, You, Chen, Xiaolin, Shi, Lei, Wu, Mingjing, Deng, Kaili, Wei, Jing, Wang, Xueli, Cao, Yang, Yan, Jiaxin, Feng, Ganzhu·2020·Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is a highly infectious respiratory disease. No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for treating severe COVID-19. Objectives: To determine whether human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell infusion may be effective and safe for the treatment of severe COVID-19. Methods: Patients with severe COVID-19 were randomly divided into 2 groups: the standard treatment group and the standard treatment plus hUC-MSC infusion group. The incidence of progression from severe to critical illness, 28-day mortality, clinical symptom improvement, time to clinical symptom improvement, hematologic indicators including C-reactive protein, lymphocyte number, and interleukin 6, and imaging changes were observed and compared between the two groups. Measurements and main results: The incidence of progression from severe to critical illness and the 28-day mortality rate were 0 in the hUC-MSC treatment group, while 4 patients in the control group deteriorated to critical condition and received invasive ventilation; 3 of them died, and the 28-day mortality rate was 10.34%. In the hUC-MSC treatment group, the time to clinical improvement was shorter than that in the control group. Clinical symptoms of weakness and fatigue, shortness of breath, and low oxygen saturation obviously improved beginning on the third day of stem cell infusion and reached a significant difference on day 7. CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly lower from day 3 of infusion, the time for the lymphocyte count to return to the normal range was significantly faster, and lung inflammation absorption was significantly shorter on CT imaging in the hUC-MSC group than in the control group. Conclusions: Intravenous transplantation of hUC-MSCs is a safe and effective method that can be considered a salvage and priority treatment option for severe COVID-19. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registration; ChiCTR2000031494; Registered on 2 April 2020; http:// www.medresman.org

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13287-020-01875-5

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Shu, L., Niu, C., Li, R., Huang, T., Wang, Y., Huang, M., Ji, N., Zheng, Y., Chen, X., Shi, L., Wu, M., Deng, K., Wei, J., Wang, X., Cao, Y., Yan, J., & Feng, G.
Venue
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Published
2020-08-18
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
361-361
ISSN
1757-6512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3078961638
Cited by
303
References
38
FWCI
26.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of severe COVID-19 with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13287-020-01875-5
The paper
Shu, L., Niu, C., Li, R., Huang, T., Wang, Y., Huang, M., Ji, N., Zheng, Y., Chen, X., Shi, L., Wu, M., Deng, K., Wei, J., Wang, X., Cao, Y., Yan, J., & Feng, G. (2020). Treatment of severe COVID-19 with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01875-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.