Cited by 14Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Developing a knowledge base to support the annotation of ultrasound images of ectopic pregnancy

Open access
Dhombres, Ferdinand, Maurice, Paul, Friszer, Stéphanie, Guilbaud, Lucie, Lelong, Nathalie, Khoshnood, Babak, Charlet, Jean, Perrot, Nicolas +3 more·2017·Journal of Biomedical Semantics

Abstract

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is a frequent early complication of pregnancy associated with significant rates of morbidly and mortality. The positive diagnosis of this condition is established through transvaginal ultrasound scanning. The timing of diagnosis depends on the operator expertise in identifying the signs of ectopic pregnancy, which varies dramatically among medical staff with heterogeneous training. Developing decision support systems in this context is expected to improve the identification of these signs and subsequently improve the quality of care. In this article, we present a new knowledge base for ectopic pregnancy, and we demonstrate its use on the annotation of clinical images. Results: The knowledge base is supported by an application ontology, which provides the taxonomy, the vocabulary and definitions for 24 types and 81 signs of ectopic pregnancy, 484 anatomical structures and 32 technical elements for image acquisition. The knowledge base provides a sign-centric model of the domain, with the relations of signs to ectopic pregnancy types, anatomical structures and the technical elements. The evaluation of the ontology and knowledge base demonstrated a positive feedback from a panel of 17 medical users. Leveraging these semantic resources, we developed an application for the annotation of ultrasound images. Using this application, 6 operators achieved a precision of 0.83 for the identification of signs in 208 ultrasound images corresponding to 35 clinical cases of ectopic pregnancy. Conclusions: We developed a new ectopic pregnancy knowledge base for the annotation of ultrasound images. The use of this knowledge base for the annotation of ultrasound images of ectopic pregnancy showed promising results from the perspective of clinical decision support system development. Other gynecological disorders and fetal anomalies may benefit from our approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13326-017-0117-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A knowledge base for US image annotations as a clinical decision support system based on this ontology significantly improved the timing of diagnosis.

    “the research groups Maurice et al. and Dhombres et al. showed that a knowledge base for US image annotations as a clinical decision support system based on this ontology significantly improved the timing of diagnosis [224,225].”

    From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [225]

    The Conclusions report an ontology-based knowledge base for annotating ectopic-pregnancy ultrasound images. But the Discussion (‘Preliminary evaluation’; ‘Toward a clinical decision support system’) says the application did not yet support diagnosis and describes a decision support system as a future prospect. It reports no significant improvement in the timing of diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]Schmid H Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees 1994 Manchester Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing
  2. [23]Dhombres F Charlet J Jouannic J-M Mazuel L Re-use of terminological and ontological resources for the construction of domain ontologies in medicine: a description of two experimental approaches. EKAW 2010 Conference Workshop 2010 Lisbonne Springer
  3. [29]Dhombres F, Vandenbussche P-Y, Rath A, Olry A, Hanauer M, Urbero B, Charlet J: OntoOrpha: an ontology to support edition and audit of rare diseases knowledge in Orphanet. In International Conference on Biomedical Ontology; 2011-07. Olivier Bodenreider, Maryann E. Martone, Alan Ruttenberg (eds.); 2011: 241-243.
  4. [32]Miles A, Bechhofer S: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Namespace Document - HTML Variant. W3C 18 August 2009 Recommendation Edition 2009

Authors
Dhombres, F., Maurice, P., Friszer, S., Guilbaud, L., Lelong, N., Khoshnood, B., Charlet, J., Perrot, N., Jauniaux, E., Jurkovic, D., & Jouannic, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Dhombres, Ferdinand
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
2041-1480 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582379740
Cited by
14
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Semantics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
SATT-Lutech
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
ectopic pregnancy, knowledge base, clinical decision support systems, transvaginal ultrasound, ontology (information science), medical image annotation, gynecological diseases
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Ultrasonography, Data Mining, Biological Ontologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review