Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 228 of the 228 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three-dimensional in vitro culture models in oncology research

Open access
Jubelin, Camille, Muñoz-Garcia, Javier, Griscom, Laurent, Cochonneau, Denis, Ollivier, Emilie, Heymann, Marie-Françoise, Vallette, François M., Oliver, Lisa, Heymann, Dominique·2022·Cell & Bioscience

Abstract

Cancer is a multifactorial disease that is responsible for 10 million deaths per year. The intra- and inter-heterogeneity of malignant tumors make it difficult to develop single targeted approaches. Similarly, their diversity requires various models to investigate the mechanisms involved in cancer initiation, progression, drug resistance and recurrence. Of the in vitro cell-based models, monolayer adherent (also known as 2D culture) cell cultures have been used for the longest time. However, it appears that they are often less appropriate than the three-dimensional (3D) cell culture approach for mimicking the biological behavior of tumor cells, in particular the mechanisms leading to therapeutic escape and drug resistance. Multicellular tumor spheroids are widely used to study cancers in 3D, and can be generated by a multiplicity of techniques, such as liquid-based and scaffold-based 3D cultures, microfluidics and bioprinting. Organoids are more complex 3D models than multicellular tumor spheroids because they are generated from stem cells isolated from patients and are considered as powerful tools to reproduce the disease development in vitro. The present review provides an overview of the various 3D culture models that have been set up to study cancer development and drug response. The advantages of 3D models compared to 2D cell cultures, the limitations, and the fields of application of these models and their techniques of production are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13578-022-00887-3

Cites

228 of 228 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 228 references

Metadata

Authors
Jubelin, C., Muñoz-Garcia, J., Griscom, L., Cochonneau, D., Ollivier, E., Heymann, M.-F., Vallette, F. M., Oliver, L., & Heymann, D.
Venue
Cell & Bioscience
Published
2022-09-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
155-155
ISSN
2045-3701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295159834
Cited by
264
References
228
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional in vitro culture models in oncology research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13578-022-00887-3
The paper
Jubelin, C., Muñoz-Garcia, J., Griscom, L., Cochonneau, D., Ollivier, E., Heymann, M.-F., Vallette, F. M., Oliver, L., & Heymann, D. (2022). Three-dimensional in vitro culture models in oncology research. Cell & Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00887-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.