The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ABYOLOv4: improved YOLOv4 human object detection based on enhanced multi-scale feature fusion
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of human object detection is to obtain the number of people and their position in images, which is one of the core problems in the field of machine vision. However, the high missing detection rate from small- and medium-sized human bodies due to the large variety of human scale in human object detection tasks still influences the performance of human object detection. To solve the above problem, this paper proposed an improved ASPP_BiFPN_YOLOv4 (ABYOLOv4) method to detect human object detection. In detail, Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) module was used to replace the original Spatial Pyramid Pooling module to increase the receptive field level of the network and improve the perception ability of multi-scale targets. Then, the original Path Aggregation Network (PANet) multi-scale fusion module was replaced by the self-built bi-layer bidirectional feature pyramid network (Bi-FPN). Meanwhile, a new feature was imported into the proposed model to reuse the mid- and low-level features, which could enhance the ability of the network to express the characteristics of small- and medium-sized targets. Finally, the standard convolution in Bi-FPN was replaced by depth-separable convolution to make the network achieve the balance of accuracy and the number of parameters. To identify the performance of the proposed ABYOLOv4 model, the human object detection experiment is carried out by using the public data set of VOC2007 and VOC2012, the improved YOLOv4 algorithm is 0.5% higher than the original AP algorithm, and the weight file size of the model is reduced by 45.3 M. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed ABYOLOv4 network has higher accuracy and lower computational cost for human target detection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“YOLO's head typically uses multi-scale anchor boxes, ensuring effective detection of objects at different scales [42].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection
Tan, M., Pang, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · Cited by 9,841 · cited 1×
“(2) To enhance the feature representation capability of the network for small-and medium-sized targets, a custom-built two-layer Bi-FPN (Bidirectional Feature Pyr-amid Network) [23] is employed to replace the original PANet (path aggregation network) [24] multi-scale fusion module.”
MethodHypercolumns for object segmentation and fine-grained localization
Hariharan, B., Arbelaez, P., Girshick, R., & Malik, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298642 · Cited by 1,511
Instance-aware Semantic Segmentation via Multi-task Network Cascades
Dai, J., He, K., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.04412 · Cited by 1,273
Object Detection from Video Tubelets with Convolutional Neural Networks
Kang, K., Ouyang, W., Li, H., & Wang, X. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.95 · Cited by 386
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- B. Hariharan, P. Arbelaez, R. Girshick, J. Malik, Simultaneous detection and segmentation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, Proceedings, Part VII 13, 297–312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009142905550561 · DOI
- K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollar, and R. Girshick, Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2961–2969 (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.06870 · DOI · Paper page
- A. Karpathy, L. Fei-Fei, Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 3128–3137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · DOI · Paper page
- Xu, J. Ba, R. Kiros, K. Cho, A. Courville, R. Salakhudinov et al., Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In International conference on machine learning, 2048–2057 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298935 · DOI · Paper page
- Q. Wu, C. Shen, P. Wang, A. Dick, A. van den Hengel, Image captioning and visual question answering based on attributes and external knowledge. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 40(6), 1367–1381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2017.2708709 · DOI
- C. Rother, V. Kolmogorov, A. Blake, "GrabCut”: interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. CM Trans. Graph. 3(3), 309–314 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1015706.1015720 · DOI · Paper page
- S.D. Han, W.B. Tao, X.L. Wu, X.C. Tai, T.J. Wang, Fast image segmentation based on multilevel banded closed-form method. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 31(3), 216–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.10.005 · DOI
- R. Ronfard, C. Schmid, B. Triggs, Learning to parse pictures of people. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 700–714 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47979-1_47 · DOI
- R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, J. Malik, Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 580–587 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
- R. Girshick, Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1440–1448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
- T.Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, P. Dollár, Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2980–2988 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · DOI · Paper page
- W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.Y. Fu, et al. SSD: single shot multibox detector. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference. Part I 14 (21–37) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-02 · DOI
- A. Bochkovskiy, C.Y. Wang, H.Y. M. Liao, Yolov4: optimal speed and accuracy of object detection, (2020). arXiv:2004.10934 · arXiv
- D. Wu, S. Lv, M. Jiang, H. Song, Using channel pruning-based YOLO v4 deep learning algorithm for the real-time and accurate detection of apple flowers in natural environments. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 178, 105742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105742 · DOI · Paper page
- K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. 37(9), 1904–1916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2015.2389824 · DOI · Paper page
- L.C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, A.L. Yuille, Deeplab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 40(4), 834–848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2017.2699184 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Liu, L. Qi, H. Qin, J. Shi, J. Jia, Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 8759–8768 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2018.00913 · DOI · Paper page
- A.G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang, Weyand, T. et al., Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. (2017). arXiv:1704.04861 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, R., Zeng, X., Yang, S., Li, Q., Yan, A., & Li, D.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Shiqiang
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2024-01-04
- Volume
- 2024
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1110-8657 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-6180
- OpenAlex
- W4390580017
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education 2022 General Special Research Program Projects (22JK0471)
- China Postdoctoral Foundation Project (2022MD723841)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- human object detection, YOLOv4, multi-scale feature fusion, BiFPN, atrous spatial pyramid pooling, depthwise separable convolution, model compression, VOC2007
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review