The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ViSQOL: an objective speech quality model
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an objective speech quality model, ViSQOL, the Virtual Speech Quality Objective Listener. It is a signal-based, full-reference, intrusive metric that models human speech quality perception using a spectro-temporal measure of similarity between a reference and a test speech signal. The metric has been particularly designed to be robust for quality issues associated with Voice over IP (VoIP) transmission. This paper describes the algorithm and compares the quality predictions with the ITU-T standard metrics PESQ and POLQA for common problems in VoIP: clock drift, associated time warping, and playout delays. The results indicate that ViSQOL and POLQA significantly outperform PESQ, with ViSQOL competing well with POLQA. An extensive benchmarking against PESQ, POLQA, and simpler distance metrics using three speech corpora (NOIZEUS and E4 and the ITU-T P.Sup. 23 database) is also presented. These experiments benchmark the performance for a wide range of quality impairments, including VoIP degradations, a variety of background noise types, speech enhancement methods, and SNR levels. The results and subsequent analysis show that both ViSQOL and POLQA have some performance weaknesses and under-predict perceived quality in certain VoIP conditions. Both have a wider application and robustness to conditions than PESQ or more trivial distance metrics. ViSQOL is shown to offer a useful alternative to POLQA in predicting speech quality in VoIP scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Cited by
Audiolm: A language modeling approach to audio generation
Borsos, Z., Marinier, R., Vincent, D., Kharitonov, E., Pietquin, O., Sharifi, M., Roblek, D., Teboul, O., Grangier, D., Tagliasacchi, M., et al. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3288409 · Cited by 432
Reddy, C. K. A., Gopal, V., Cutler, R., Beyrami, E., Cheng, R., Dubey, H., Matusevych, S., Aichner, R., Aazami, A., Braun, S., et al. (2020) · Interspeech 2020 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2020-3038 · Cited by 363
An Overview of Deep-Learning-Based Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement and Separation
Michelsanti, D., Tan, Z.-H., Zhang, S.-X., Xu, Y., Yu, M., Yu, D., & Jensen, J. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3066303 · Cited by 316
Measuring the Robustness of Audio Deepfake Detection under Real-World Corruption
Li, X., Chen, P.-Y., & Wei, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy · doi:10.1145/3800506.3803494
“We primarily rely on ViSQOL, as it more reliably captures perceptual degradation than SNR [12].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hines, A., Skoglund, J., Kokaram, A. C., & Harte, N.
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing
- Published
- 2015-05-17
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-4714 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-4722
- OpenAlex
- W1728888090
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ViSQOL: an objective speech quality model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13636-015-0054-9
- The paper
- Hines, A., Skoglund, J., Kokaram, A. C., & Harte, N. (2015). ViSQOL: an objective speech quality model. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13636-015-0054-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.