Cited by 432Speech Recognition and SynthesisMusic and Audio ProcessingSpeech and Audio Processing

Audiolm: A language modeling approach to audio generation

Open access
Borsos, Zalán, Marinier, Raphaël, Vincent, Damien, Kharitonov, Eugene, Pietquin, Olivier, Sharifi, Matt, Roblek, Dominik, Teboul, Olivier +3 more·2023·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing

Abstract

We introduce AudioLM, a framework for high-quality audio generation with long-term consistency. AudioLM maps the input audio to a sequence of discrete tokens and casts audio generation as a language modeling task in this representation space. We show how existing audio tokenizers provide different trade-offs between reconstruction quality and long-term structure, and we propose a hybrid tokenization scheme to achieve both objectives. Namely, we leverage the discretized activations of a masked language model pre-trained on audio to capture long-term structure and the discrete codes produced by a neural audio codec to achieve high-quality synthesis. By training on large corpora of raw audio waveforms, AudioLM learns to generate natural and coherent continuations given short prompts. When trained on speech, and without any transcript or annotation, AudioLM generates syntactically and semantically plausible speech continuations while also maintaining speaker identity and prosody for unseen speakers. Furthermore, we demonstrate how our approach extends beyond speech by generating coherent piano music continuations, despite being trained without any symbolic representation of music.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taslp.2023.3288409

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dominant architectural paradigm connects specialized, external multimodal encoders-such as CLIP for vision or CLAP for audio-to the LLM backbone via alignment modules like Q-Former or simple MLPs, a modular design that allows for independent encoder updates without retraining the entire model.

    “The dominant architectural paradigm connects specialized, external multimodal encoders-such as CLIP for vision or CLAP for audio-to the LLM backbone via alignment modules like Q-Former or simple MLPs [19, 86, 615, 1139], a modular design that allows for independent encoder updates without retraining the entire model [624].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. N. Kalchbrenner, E. Elsen, K. Simonyan, S. Noury, N. Casagrande, E. Lockhart, F. Stimberg, A. van den Oord, S. Dieleman, and K. Kavukcuoglu, "Efficient neural audio synthesis," in International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), vol. 80. PMLR, 2018, pp. 2415-2424.
  2. J. Kong, J. Kim, and J. Bae, "Hifi-gan: Generative adversarial networks for efficient and high fidelity speech synthesis," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020.
  3. M. Tagliasacchi, Y. Li, K. Misiunas, and D. Roblek, "SEANet: A multi- modal speech enhancement network," in Interspeech, 2020.
  4. Z. Kong, W. Ping, J. Huang, K. Zhao, and B. Catanzaro, "DiffWave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis," in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  5. N. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Zen, R. J. Weiss, M. Norouzi, and W. Chan, "WaveGrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation," in Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  6. T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert- Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei, "Language models are few-shot learners," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020.
  7. J. W. Rae, S. Borgeaud, T. Cai, K. Millican, J. Hoffmann, F. Song, J. Aslanides, S. Henderson, R. Ring, S. Young et al., "Scaling lan- guage models: Methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher," arXiv:2112.11446, 2021. · arXiv
  8. J. Yu, X. Li, J. Y. Koh, H. Zhang, R. Pang, J. Qin, A. Ku, Y. Xu, J. Baldridge, and Y. Wu, "Vector-quantized image modeling with improved VQGAN," in International Conference on Learning Represen- tations (ICLR), 2022.
  9. J. Yu, Y. Xu, J. Y. Koh, T. Luong, G. Baid, Z. Wang, V. Vasudevan, A. Ku, Y. Yang, B. K. Ayan, B. Hutchinson, W. Han, Z. Parekh, X. Li, H. Zhang, J. Baldridge, and Y. Wu, "Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation," Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2022.
  10. E. Dunbar, M. Bernard, N. Hamilakis, T. A. Nguyen, M. de Seyssel, P. Rozé, M. Rivière, E. Kharitonov, and E. Dupoux, "The zero resource speech challenge 2021: Spoken language modelling," in Interspeech. ISCA, 2021, pp. 1574-1578.
  11. K. Lakhotia, E. Kharitonov, W.-N. Hsu, Y. Adi, A. Polyak, B. Bolte, T.-A. Nguyen, J. Copet, A. Baevski, A. Mohamed et al., "On generative spoken language modeling from raw audio," Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 1336-1354, 2021.
  12. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 5998-6008.
  13. N. Zeghidour, A. Luebs, A. Omran, J. Skoglund, and M. Tagliasacchi, "Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec," IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 30, pp. 495-507, 2022.
  14. A. Roberts, H. W. Chung, A. Levskaya, G. Mishra, J. Bradbury, D. Andor, S. Narang, B. Lester, C. Gaffney, A. Mohiuddin, C. Hawthorne, A. Lewkowycz, A. Salcianu, M. van Zee, J. Austin, S. Goodman, L. B. Soares, H. Hu, S. Tsvyashchenko, A. Chowdhery, J. Bastings, J. Bulian, X. Garcia, J. Ni, A. Chen, K. Kenealy, J. H. Clark, S. Lee, D. Garrette, J. Lee-Thorp, C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, M. Ritter, M. Bosma, A. Passos, J. Maitin-Shepard, N. Fiedel, M. Omernick, B. Saeta, R. Sepassi, A. Spiridonov, J. Newlan, and A. Gesmundo, "Scaling up models and data with t5x and seqio," arXiv:2203.17189, 2022. · arXiv
  15. A. van den Oord, Y. Li, I. Babuschkin, K. Simonyan, O. Vinyals, K. Kavukcuoglu, G. van den Driessche, E. Lockhart, L. C. Cobo, F. Stimberg, N. Casagrande, D. Grewe, S. Noury, S. Dieleman, E. Elsen, N. Kalchbrenner, H. Zen, A. Graves, H. King, T. Walters, D. Belov, and D. Hassabis, "Parallel WaveNet: Fast high-fidelity speech synthesis," in International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 80. PMLR, 2018, pp. 3915-3923.
  16. M. Binkowski, J. Donahue, S. Dieleman, A. Clark, E. Elsen, N. Casagrande, L. C. Cobo, and K. Simonyan, "High fidelity speech synthesis with adversarial networks," in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  17. A. van den Oord, O. Vinyals, and K. Kavukcuoglu, "Neural discrete representation learning," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 6306-6315.
  18. A. Razavi, A. van den Oord, and O. Vinyals, "Generating diverse high- fidelity images with VQ-VAE-2," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019, pp. 14 837-14 847.
  19. E. Agustsson, F. Mentzer, M. Tschannen, L. Cavigelli, R. Timofte, L. Benini, and L. V. Gool, "Soft-to-hard vector quantization for end-to- end learned compression of images and neural networks," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017.
  20. S. Kankanahalli, "End-to-end optimized speech coding with deep neural networks," in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2018, pp. 2521-2525.
  21. K. Zhen, J. Sung, M. S. Lee, S. Beack, and M. Kim, "Cascaded cross- module residual learning towards lightweight end-to-end speech coding," in Interspeech. ISCA, 2019, pp. 3396-3400.
  22. D. Petermann, S. Beack, and M. Kim, "HARP-Net: Hyper- autoencoded reconstruction propagation for scalable neural audio coding," arXiv:2107.10843, 2021. · arXiv
  23. A. Baevski, H. Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli, "wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations," arXiv:2006.11477, 2020. · arXiv
  24. A. Saeed, D. Grangier, and N. Zeghidour, "Contrastive learning of general- purpose audio representations," in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 3875-3879.
  25. E. Kharitonov, M. Rivière, G. Synnaeve, L. Wolf, P. Mazaré, M. Douze, and E. Dupoux, "Data augmenting contrastive learning of speech repre- sentations in the time domain," in IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, SLT 2021, Shenzhen, China, January 19-22, 2021. IEEE, 2021, pp. 215-222.
  26. A. Baevski, S. Schneider, and M. Auli, "vq-wav2vec: Self-supervised learning of discrete speech representations," in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  27. W. Hsu, B. Bolte, Y. H. Tsai, K. Lakhotia, R. Salakhutdinov, and A. Mohamed, "Hubert: Self-supervised speech representation learning by masked prediction of hidden units," IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., vol. 29, pp. 3451-3460, 2021.
  28. R. Thoppilan, D. D. Freitas, J. Hall, N. Shazeer, A. Kulshreshtha, H. Cheng, A. Jin, T. Bos, L. Baker, Y. Du, Y. Li, H. Lee, H. S. Zheng, A. Ghafouri, M. Menegali, Y. Huang, M. Krikun, D. Lepikhin, J. Qin, D. Chen, Y. Xu, Z. Chen, A. Roberts, M. Bosma, Y. Zhou, C. Chang, I. Krivokon, W. Rusch, M. Pickett, K. S. Meier-Hellstern, M. R. Morris, T. Doshi, R. D. Santos, T. Duke, J. Soraker, B. Zevenbergen, V. Prab- hakaran, M. Diaz, B. Hutchinson, K. Olson, A. Molina, E. Hoffman-John, J. Lee, L. Aroyo, R. Rajakumar, A. Butryna, M. Lamm, V. Kuzmina, J. Fenton, A. Cohen, R. Bernstein, R. Kurzweil, B. Aguera-Arcas, C. Cui, M. Croak, E. H. Chi, and Q. Le, "LaMDA: Language models for dialog applications," arXiv:2201.08239, 2022. · arXiv
  29. G. Lample and F. Charton, "Deep learning for symbolic mathematics," in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  30. A. Roy, M. Saffar, A. Vaswani, and D. Grangier, "Efficient content- based sparse attention with routing transformers," Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, vol. 9, pp. 53-68, 2021.
  31. C. Hawthorne, A. Jaegle, C. Cangea, S. Borgeaud, C. Nash, M. Mali- nowski, S. Dieleman, O. Vinyals, M. M. Botvinick, I. Simon, H. Sheahan, N. Zeghidour, J. Alayrac, J. Carreira, and J. H. Engel, "General-purpose, long-context autoregressive modeling with Perceiver AR," in International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 162. PMLR, 2022, pp. 8535-8558.
  32. P. Esser, R. Rombach, and B. Ommer, "Taming transformers for high- resolution image synthesis," in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, 2021, pp. 12 873-12 883.
  33. S. Ge, T. Hayes, H. Yang, X. Yin, G. Pang, D. Jacobs, J. Huang, and D. Parikh, "Long video generation with time-agnostic VQGAN and time-sensitive transformer," arXiv:2204.03638, 2022. · arXiv
  34. P. Dhariwal, H. Jun, C. Payne, J. W. Kim, A. Radford, and I. Sutskever, "Jukebox: A generative model for music," arXiv:2005.00341, 2020. · arXiv
  35. E. Kharitonov, A. Lee, A. Polyak, Y. Adi, J. Copet, K. Lakhotia, T. A. Nguyen, M. Rivière, A. Mohamed, E. Dupoux, and W. Hsu, "Text-free prosody-aware generative spoken language modeling," in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022, pp. 8666-8681.
  36. E. Kharitonov, J. Copet, K. Lakhotia, T. A. Nguyen, P. Tomasello, A. Lee, A. Elkahky, W. Hsu, A. Mohamed, E. Dupoux, and Y. Adi, "textless-lib: a library for textless spoken language processing," arXiv:2202.07359, 2022. · arXiv
  37. A. Conneau, A. Bapna, Y. Zhang, M. Ma, P. von Platen, A. Lozhkov, C. Cherry, Y. Jia, C. Rivera, M. Kale, D. van Esch, V. Axelrod, S. Khanuja, J. H. Clark, O. Firat, M. Auli, S. Ruder, J. Riesa, and M. Johnson, "XTREME-S: evaluating cross-lingual speech representa- tions," arXiv:2203.10752, 2022. · arXiv
  38. A. Hines, J. Skoglund, A. C. Kokaram, and N. Harte, "ViSQOL: an objective speech quality model," EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, vol. 2015, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2015.
  39. M. Chinen, F. S. C. Lim, J. Skoglund, N. Gureev, F. O'Gorman, and A. Hines, "ViSQOL v3: an open source production ready objective speech and audio metric," in Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2020, pp. 1-6.
  40. T. Schatz, V. Peddinti, F. R. Bach, A. Jansen, H. Hermansky, and E. Dupoux, "Evaluating speech features with the minimal-pair ABX task: analysis of the classical MFC/PLP pipeline," in Interspeech. ISCA, 2013, pp. 1781-1785.
  41. T. Schatz, "Abx-discriminability measures and applications. (mesures de discriminabilité ABX et applications)," Ph.D. dissertation, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France, 2016.
  42. J. Kahn, M. Rivière, W. Zheng, E. Kharitonov, Q. Xu, P. Mazaré, J. Karadayi, V. Liptchinsky, R. Collobert, C. Fuegen, T. Likhomanenko, G. Synnaeve, A. Joulin, A. Mohamed, and E. Dupoux, "Libri-light: A benchmark for ASR with limited or no supervision," in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2020, pp. 7669-7673.
  43. M. Rivière and E. Dupoux, "Towards unsupervised learning of speech features in the wild," in IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT). IEEE, 2021, pp. 156-163.
  44. A. Gulati, J. Qin, C. Chiu, N. Parmar, Y. Zhang, J. Yu, W. Han, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, and R. Pang, "Conformer: Convolution-augmented transformer for speech recognition," in Interspeech. ISCA, 2020, pp. 5036-5040.
  45. W. Hsu, Y. H. Tsai, B. Bolte, R. Salakhutdinov, and A. Mohamed, "Hubert: How much can a bad teacher benefit ASR pre-training?" in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 6533-6537.
  46. M. Tagliasacchi, B. Gfeller, F. de Chaumont Quitry, and D. Rob- lek, "Self-supervised audio representation learning for mobile devices," arXiv:1905.11796, 2019. · arXiv
  47. T. A. Nguyen, B. Sagot, and E. Dupoux, "Are discrete units necessary for spoken language modeling?" arXiv:2203.05936, 2022. · arXiv
  48. P. Peng and D. Harwath, "Self-supervised representation learning for speech using visual grounding and masked language modeling," arXiv:2202.03543, 2022. · arXiv
  49. Y. Liu, M. Ott, N. Goyal, J. Du, M. Joshi, D. Chen, O. Levy, M. Lewis, L. Zettlemoyer, and V. Stoyanov, "Roberta: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach," arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. · arXiv
  50. B. van Niekerk, L. Nortje, M. Baas, and H. Kamper, "Analyzing speaker information in self-supervised models to improve zero-resource speech processing," in Interspeech. ISCA, 2021, pp. 1554-1558.
  51. C. Hawthorne, A. Stasyuk, A. Roberts, I. Simon, C. A. Huang, S. Dieleman, E. Elsen, J. H. Engel, and D. Eck, "Enabling factorized piano music modeling and generation with the MAESTRO dataset," in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019.
  52. H. Delgado, N. W. D. Evans, T. Kinnunen, K. A. Lee, X. Liu, A. Nautsch, J. Patino, M. Sahidullah, M. Todisco, X. Wang, and J. Yamagishi, "Asvspoof 2021: Automatic speaker verification spoofing and countermeasures challenge evaluation plan," arXiv:2109.00535, 2021. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borsos, Z., Marinier, R., Vincent, D., Kharitonov, E., Pietquin, O., Sharifi, M., Roblek, D., Teboul, O., Grangier, D., Tagliasacchi, M., & Zeghidour, N.
Affiliations
  • Google (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Published
2023
Volume
31
Pages
2523-2533
ISSN
  • 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9304
OpenAlex
W4381786045
Cited by
432
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 150 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 2
FWCI
40.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
audio generation, audio tokenization, neural audio codecs, masked language models, long-term consistency, speech synthesis, speaker identity preservation, prosody, audio-to-audio translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review