Cited by 4HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effectiveness of interventions for prevention of common infections in people who use opioids: a protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews

Open access
Kudrina, Irina, Puzhko, Svetlana, Filion, Kristian B., Gore, Genevieve, Paraskevopoulos, Elena, Windle, Sarah, Martel, Marc O., Eisenberg, Mark J.·2021·Systematic Reviews

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The North American opioid crisis is driven by opioid-related mortality and morbidity, including opioid use-associated infections (OUAIs), resulting in a substantial burden for society. Users of legal and illegal opioids are at an increased risk of OUAIs compared to individuals not using opioids. As reported for hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), bacterial, fungal, and other infections, OUAIs transmission and acquisition risks may be modifiable. Several systematic reviews (SRs) synthetized data regarding interventions to prevent infections in persons using drugs (e.g., opioid substitution therapy, needle and syringes exchange programs, psycho-social interventions); however, their conclusions varied. Therefore, SR of published SRs is needed to synthesize the highest level of evidence on the scope and effectiveness of interventions to prevent OUAIs in people using opioids legally or illegally. Methods: We will comprehensively search for SRs in the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, and Google Scholar databases from inception to November 2020. Data selection and extraction for each SR will be performed independently by two researchers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. All SRs regarding interventions with evaluated effectiveness to prevent OUAI in legal and/or illegal opioid users will be eligible. Risk of bias assessment will be performed using the AMSTAR2 tool. The results will be qualitatively synthesized, and a typology of interventions’ effectiveness with a statement on the strength of evidence for each category will be created. Discussion: Our pilot search of PubMed resulted in 379 SRs analyzing the effectiveness of interventions to prevent HCV and HIV in persons who inject different types of drugs, including opioids. Of these 379 SRs, 8 evaluated primary studies where participants used opioids and would therefore be eligible for inclusion. The search results thus justify the application of SR of SRs approach. Comprehensive data on the scope and effectiveness of existing interventions to prevent OUAIs will help policy-makers to plan and implement preventive interventions and will assist clinicians in the guidance for their patients using opioids. Systematic review registration: Registered in PROSPERO on 30 July 2020 ( #195929 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13643-021-01852-w

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distribution of sterile injecting equipment through syringe services programs is effective for preventing HIV and HCV infections.

    “The distribution of sterile injecting equipment through syringe services programs is an effective intervention for preventing HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections 261 .”

    From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [261]

    The Background and Discussion describe a planned review of interventions to prevent HIV and HCV, but do not report whether syringe services programs are effective. The References list reviews about sterile injecting equipment and needle–syringe programs; their titles do not establish the claimed finding in this paper. Searches for sterile injecting equipment, syringe services programs, and their effectiveness found no decisive passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]Pollock M Fernandes RM Becker LA Pieper D Hartling L Chapter V: overviews of reviews Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 2018
  2. [53]Ellis S Barnett-Page E Morgan A Taylor L Walters R Goodrich J HIV prevention: a review of reviews assessing the effectiveness of interventions to reduce the risk of sexual transmission 2003 London Health Development Agency

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kudrina, I., Puzhko, S., Filion, K. B., Gore, G., Paraskevopoulos, E., Windle, S., Martel, M. O., & Eisenberg, M. J.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Queensway-Carleton Hospital (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Kudrina, Irina
Venue
Systematic Reviews
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
298-298
ISSN
2046-4053 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3117054297
Cited by
4
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#EOC-162067)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
people who use opioids, infection prevention interventions, opioid substitution therapy, psychosocial interventions, hepatitis C, HIV, opioid use disorder, harm reduction
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Analgesics, Opioid, Hepatitis C, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review