Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria

Callaghan, Max, Müller-Hansen, Finn, Bond, Melissa, Hamel, Candyce, Devane, Declan, Kusa, Wojciech, O’Mara-Eves, Alison, Spijker, Rene, Stevenson, Mark, Stansfield, Claire, Thomas, James, Minx, Jan C.·2024·Systematic Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13643-024-02699-7

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Five recommendations to advance the evaluation and implementation of safe use of stopping criteria in ML-prioritised screening
Fig. 1 Five recommendations to advance the evaluation and implementation of safe use of stopping criteria in ML-prioritised screeningCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Saldanha, I. J., Adam, G. P., Schmid, C. H., Trikalinos, T. A., & Konnyu, K. J. (2023). Modernizing evidence synthesis for evidence-based medicine. In Clinical Decision Support and beyond: Progress and Opportunities in Knowledge-Enhanced Health and Healthcare (pp. 257–278). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91200-6.00006-1 · DOI
  2. Surkovic E, Vigar D. Scientific advice for policymakers on climate change: the role of evidence synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2022;380(2221):20210147. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0147. · DOI
  3. Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Briscoe, S., Featherstone, R., Metzendorf, M.-I., Noel-Storr, A., Paynter, R., Rader, T., Thomas, J., & Wieland, L. (2023). Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In J. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. Page, & V. Welch, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4 (updated October 2023)). https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04
  4. Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., & Welch, V. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2015;66(11):2215–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., Nori, H., Palangi, H., Ribeiro, M. T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4 (arXiv:2303.12712). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., Davison, J., Shleifer, S., von Platen, P., Ma, C., Jernite, Y., Plu, J., Xu, C., Le Scao, T., Gugger, S., … Rush, A. (2020). Transformers: state-of-the-art natural language processing. In Q. Liu & D. Schlangen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (pp. 38–45). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chappell M, Edwards M, Watkins D, Marshall C, Graziadio S. Machine learning for accelerating screening in evidence reviews. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods. 2023;1(5): e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12021. · DOI
  9. Cormack, G. V., & Grossman, M. R. (2014). Evaluation of machine-learning protocols for technology-assisted review in electronic discovery. Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609601 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lewis, D. D., Gray, L., & Noel, M. (2023). Confidence sequences for evaluating one-phase technology-assisted review. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595167 · DOI
  11. Callaghan, M., & Müller-Hansen, F. (2020). Statistical stopping criteria for automated screening in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18218/v2 · DOI
  12. Lefebvre, C., Glanville, J., Briscoe, S., A Littlewood, Marshall, C., Metzendorf, M.-I., Noel-Storr, A., Rader, T., Shokraneh, F., Thomas, J., & Wieland, L. (2019). Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In J. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. Page, & V. Welch, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6 (updated October 2019)). https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04 · DOI · Paper page
  13. MacDonald H, Comer C, Foster M, Labelle PR, Marsalis S, Nyhan K, Premji Z, Rogers M, Splenda R, Stansfield C, Young S. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024;20(3): e1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1433. · DOI
  14. Molinari A, Esuli A. SALτ: efficiently stopping TAR by improving priors estimates. Data Min Knowl Disc. 2024;38(2):535–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-023-00961-5. · DOI
  15. Sneyd, A., & Stevenson, M. (2019). Modelling stopping criteria for search results using poisson processes. In K. Inui, J. Jiang, V. Ng, & X. W. 0001 (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, hong kong, china, november 3–7, 2019 (pp. 3482–3487). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1351 · DOI
  16. Stevenson M, Bin-Hezam R. Stopping methods for technology assisted reviews based on point processes. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 2024;42(3):1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3631990. · DOI
  17. The Systematic Review Toolbox. (n.d.). Retrieved 12 October 2023, from http://systematicreviewtools.com/software.php
  18. Jonnalagadda S, Petitti D. A new iterative method to reduce workload in systematic review process. Int J Comput Biol Drug Des. 2013;6(1–2):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCBDD.2013.052198. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kusa, W., Zuccon, G., Knoth, P., & Hanbury, A. (2023). Outcome-based evaluation of systematic review automation. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3578337.3605135 · DOI
  20. Scholer, F., Kelly, D., Wu, W.-C., Lee, H. S., & Webber, W. (2013). The effect of threshold priming and need for cognition on relevance calibration and assessment. Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1145/2484028.2484090 · DOI
  21. Stansfield C, Stokes G, Thomas J. Applying machine classifiers to update searches: analysis from two case studies. Research Synthesis Methods. 2022;13(1):121–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1537. · DOI

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Callaghan, M., Müller-Hansen, F., Bond, M., Hamel, C., Devane, D., Kusa, W., O’Mara-Eves, A., Spijker, R., Stevenson, M., Stansfield, C., Thomas, J., & Minx, J. C.
Venue
Systematic Reviews
Published
2024-11-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
2046-4053
Cited by
27
References
12
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13643-024-02699-7
The paper
Callaghan, M., Müller-Hansen, F., Bond, M., Hamel, C., Devane, D., Kusa, W., O’Mara-Eves, A., Spijker, R., Stevenson, M., Stansfield, C., Thomas, J., & Minx, J. C. (2024). Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria. Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02699-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.