Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing intrusion detection: a hybrid machine and deep learning approach

Open access
Sajid, Muhammad, Malik, Kaleem Razzaq, Almogren, Ahmad, Malik, Tauqeer Safdar, Khan, Ali Haider, Tanveer, Jawad, Rehman, Ateeq Ur·2024·Journal of Cloud Computing

Abstract

The volume of data transferred across communication infrastructures has recently increased due to technological advancements in cloud computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and automobile networks. The network systems transmit diverse and heterogeneous data in dispersed environments as communication technology develops. The communications using these networks and daily interactions depend on network security systems to provide secure and reliable information. On the other hand, attackers have increased their efforts to render systems on networks susceptible. An efficient intrusion detection system is essential since technological advancements embark on new kinds of attacks and security limitations. This paper implements a hybrid model for Intrusion Detection (ID) with Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques to tackle these limitations. The proposed model makes use of Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) for feature extraction and then combines each of these with long short-term memory networks (LSTM) for classification. Four benchmark datasets CIC IDS 2017, UNSW NB15, NSL KDD, and WSN DS were used to train the model for binary and multi-class classification. With the increase in feature dimensions, current intrusion detection systems have trouble identifying new threats due to low test accuracy scores. To narrow down each dataset’s feature space, XGBoost, and CNN feature selection algorithms are used in this work for each separate model. The experimental findings demonstrate a high detection rate and good accuracy with a relatively low False Acceptance Rate (FAR) to prove the usefulness of the proposed hybrid model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13677-024-00685-x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Metadata

Authors
Sajid, M., Malik, K. R., Almogren, A., Malik, T. S., Khan, A. H., Tanveer, J., & Rehman, A. U.
Venue
Journal of Cloud Computing
Published
2024-07-17
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
2192-113X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400737507
Cited by
283
References
53
FWCI
47.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing intrusion detection: a hybrid machine and deep learning approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13677-024-00685-x
The paper
Sajid, M., Malik, K. R., Almogren, A., Malik, T. S., Khan, A. H., Tanveer, J., & Rehman, A. U. (2024). Enhancing intrusion detection: a hybrid machine and deep learning approach. Journal of Cloud Computing. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-024-00685-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.