Cited by 59Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioenergy crop production and management

Cultivation of Microalgae for Biofuel Production: Coupling with Sugarcane-Processing Factories

Open access
Zewdie, Deribew Tefera, Ali, Abubeker Yimam·2020·Energy Sustainability and Society

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite their potential as biofuel resources, large-scale production of biofuels from microalgae is still uncertain primarily due to a lack of feasibility of the process and that it proves to be capital and energy intensive. Therefore, an integration of microalgal cultivation with other processes for achieving an inexpensive nutrient and energy use is an important issue. In the present study, the potential of the flue gas and the wastewater of a sugar factory to support microalgae growth for biofuel and bio-fertilizer production is evaluated. Methods The study was carried out by following a case study approach; an Ethiopian sugarcane-processing factory, Metahara sugar and ethanol production factory, was selected for this purpose. Conceptual microalgal biofuel production was integrated with the real sugarcane-processing factory, and the process was evaluated with regard to the product outputs and energy requirements. Results The integrated process model shows that three products, biodiesel, upgraded biogas, and bio-fertilizer with production capacities of 188 tons/year, 1,974,882 m3/year and 42 tons/year, respectively, were produced. For the production of these products, the electricity and thermal energy demand of the integrated process amounted to 1822.13 and 3244.99 MWh/year, respectively. A sensitivity analysis shows that the oil content of the algae, the nitrogen content of the waste, the oil extraction efficiency, and the transesterification efficiency are the main factors which affect the biodiesel production capacity of the integrated process. Conclusions This case study approach investigated the potential of a future possible bio-refinery and environmental pollution reduction concept by integrating microalgae biomass production with sugarcane-processing factory wastes and by-products. It was found that the factory wastes and by-products have a significant potential for a viable biofuel production from microalgae.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13705-020-00262-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nutrient-rich wastewater from dairy and sugar processing contains essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, which if untreated can disrupt water uses.

    “Nutrient-rich wastewater from sources such as dairy and sugar processing contains essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, which, if untreated, can disrupt normal water uses, including drinking, irrigation, and recreational activities [134-137].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M. Zappi, R. Hernandez, D. Sparks, J. Horne, and M. Brough, "A review of the engineering aspects of the biodiesel industry," MSU E-TECH Lab. Rep., vol. ET-03-003, no. August, 2003.
  2. L. Miroslav, Hutňan; Nina, Kolesárová; Igor, Bodík; Viera, Špalková; Michal, "Possibilities of anaerobic treatment of crude glycerol from biodiesel production," in 36th International Conference of Slovak Society of Chemical Engineering, 2009, pp. 156-1-156-13.
  3. G. T. F. L. B. H. D. Stensel, Waste Water Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Fourth Edi. McGraw-Hill, Inc, 2003.
  4. Q. Richmond, A., & Hu, Ed., Handbook of microalgal culture, Second edt. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013.

Authors
Zewdie, D. T., & Ali, A. Y.
Affiliations
Addis Ababa University (ET)
Venue
Energy Sustainability and Society
Published
2020-08-05
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2192-0567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047552326
Cited by
59
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Sustainability and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Addis Ababa University
  • Debre Tabor University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, microalgal biofuels, biodiesel, flue gas, sugar industry wastewater, biogas upgrading, biofertilizers, process integration, energy requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review