CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Antibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in HealthcareAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Correction to: Cross-border comparison of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and AMR prevention measures: the healthcare workers’ perspective

Open access
Keizer, J., Braakman-Jansen, L. M. A., Kampmeier, S., Köck, R., Al Naiemi, N., Te Riet-Warning, R., Jong, N. Beerlage-De, Becker, K. +1 more·2019·Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
DOI 10.1186/s13756-019-0589-0PMC PMC6688297
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The original article [1] contained a minor editorial typo in the following sentence which has now been corrected:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13756-019-0589-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain eHealth development approaches are less suitable for people with dementia because of the cognitive skills they require.

    “they seem to be less suitable for people with dementia because of the cognitive skills that would be required [48,61,178].”

    From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [178]

  • In-depth interviews might be a useful way to gather information from health care workers and experts, but they seem to be less suitable for people with dementia because of the cognitive skills that would be required.

    “To illustrate, although in-depth interviews might be a useful way to gather information from health care workers and experts, they seem to be less suitable for people with dementia because of the cognitive skills that would be required”

    From Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [178]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Keizer, J., Braakman-Jansen, L. M. A., Kampmeier, S., Köck, R., Al Naiemi, N., Te Riet-Warning, R., Jong, N. B.-D., Becker, K., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Keizer, J.
ORCID
Venue
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
133-133
ISSN
2047-2994 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s13756-019-0589-0
PMC
PMC6688297
OpenAlex
W2967052393
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, healthcare workers, cross-border comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review