Cited by 18Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer behavior in food and healthFood Supply Chain Traceability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determinants of consumer behavior in short food supply chains: a systematic literature review

Open access
Herzig, Janna, Zander, Katrin·2025·Agricultural and Food Economics

Abstract

Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are increasingly regarded as promising alternatives to industrialized food distribution systems. They aim to create geographical, logistical, and social proximity between food producers and consumers. Despite extensive research on SFSCs in recent years, our understanding of how they can best be promoted is hindered by the lack of a unified approach in extant studies of consumer perspectives on SFSCs. The aim of this systematic literature review is thus to provide a comprehensive overview of the key determinants shaping consumer behavior around SFSCs. Following PRISMA guidelines, 30 peer-reviewed articles based on empirical research of SFSC consumers in the European Union were selected for analysis, applying Alphabet Theory as a theoretical framework. The findings emphasize the influence on consumer behavior of contextual factors, information availability, and trust, as well as the relevance of other commonly studied factors such as attitudes and sociodemographics. The review further highlights the importance of understanding how these factors interact to shape consumers’ perceptions of the costs and benefits of SFSCs. Based on these findings, the study gives recommendations to address the challenges identified and suggests directions for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40100-025-00370-w

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Aertsens J, Verbeke W, Mondelaers K, van Huylenbroeck G (2009) Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. Br Food J 111(10):1140–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992961 · DOI
  2. Aguado-Gragera C, Sama-Berrocal C, Mesías FJ, Crespo-Cebada E, Diaz-Caro C (2024) Challenges and opportunities of short food supply chains in Spain: a stakeholder participatory study. J Agric Food Res 18:101276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101276 · DOI
  3. Bakos IM, Khademi-Vidra A (2019) Empirical experiences of Hungarian alternative food buying communities. Deturope 11(1):55–73. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2019.004 · DOI
  4. Baldi L, Bertoni D, Migliore G, Peri M (2019) How alternative food networks work in a metropolitan area? An analysis of Solidarity Purchase Groups in northern Italy. Agric Food Econs 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0139-3 · DOI
  5. Bazzani C, Canavari M (2013) Alternative agri-food networks and short food supply chains: a review of the literature. Econ Agro-Aliment 15(2):11–34. https://doi.org/10.3280/ECAG2013-002002 · DOI
  6. Benos T, Burkert M, Hüttl-Maack V, Petropoulou E (2022) When mindful consumption meets short food supply chains: empirical evidence on how higher-level motivations influence consumers. Sustain Prod Consum 33:520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.028 · DOI
  7. Brümmer N, Zander K (2020) Drivers of organic food choice in Germany: the case of young adults. Organ Agric 10(S1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-020-00306-2 · DOI
  8. Burgess P, Sunmola FT, Wertheim-Heck S (2024) Information communication tools in alternative food networks. Procedia Comput Sci 232:665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.066 · DOI
  9. Chang BP, Massri C, Reipurth M et al (2022) Barriers and facilitators of purchasing from short food supply chains: evidence from consumer focus groups in Germany, Spain, Greece and Hungary. Int J Food Stud 11:208–218 · DOI
  10. Cicatiello C (2020) Alternative food shoppers and the “quantity dilemma”: a study on the determinants of their purchases at alternative markets. Agric Food Econ 8:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-020-00160-6 · DOI
  11. Cicia G, Furno M, Del Giudice T (2021) Do consumers’ values and attitudes affect food retailer choice? Evidence from a national survey on farmers’ market in Germany. Agric Food Econ 9:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-020-00172-2 · DOI
  12. Cruz JL, Puigdueta I, Sanz-Cobena A, Gonzalez-Azcarate M (2021) Short food supply chains: rebuilding consumers’ trust. New Medit 20:33–47. https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2104c · DOI
  13. Csordás A, Lengyel P, Füzesi I (2022) Who prefers regional products? A systematic literature review of consumer characteristics and attitudes in short food supply chains. Sustainability 14(15):8990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14158990 · DOI
  14. de Bernardi P, Bertello A, Venuti F, Zardini A (2021) Knowledge transfer driving community-based business models towards sustainable food-related behaviours: a commons perspective. Knowl Manag Res Pract 19(3):319–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1664271 · DOI
  15. Escobar-Lopez SY, Amaya-Corchuelo S, Espinoza-Ortega A (2021) Alternative food networks: perceptions in short food supply chains in Spain. Sustainability 13(5):2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052578 · DOI
  16. Evola RS, Peira G, Varese E, Bonadonna A, Vesce E (2022) Short food supply chains in Europe: scientific research directions. Sustainability 14(6):3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063602 · DOI
  17. Fabbrizzi S, Menghini S, Marinelli N (2014) The short food supply chain: a concrete example of sustainability. A literature review. Riv Studi Sulla Sostenibilita 2(2):189–206. https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2014-002012 · DOI
  18. FAO (2023) The state of food and agriculture 2023: revealing the true cost of food to transform agrifood systems. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7724en. Accessed 25 Sep 2024 · DOI
  19. Feldmann C, Hamm U (2015) Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: a review. Food Qual Prefer 40(A):152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014 · DOI
  20. Giampietri E, Finco A, Del Giudice T (2016) Exploring consumers’ behaviour towards short food supply chains. Br Food J 118(3):618–631. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0168 · DOI
  21. Giampietri E, Verneau F, Del Giudice T, Carfora V, Finco A (2018) A theory of planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Qual Prefer 64:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.012 · DOI
  22. Gonzalez-Azcárate M, Macein JLC, Bardaji I (2021) Why buying directly from producers is a valuable choice? Expanding the scope of short food supply chains in Spain. Sust Prod Consum 26:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hamm U (1991) Landwirtschaftliches marketing: Grundlagen des Marketing für landwirtschaftliche Unternehmen. Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co, Stuttgart
  24. Harth M (2022) Agramarketing: Anforderungen an eine qualitätsorientierte Vermarktung von Agrargütern. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer GmbH & Co. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838557304 · DOI
  25. Hartmann T, Jahnke B, Hamm U (2021) Making ugly food beautiful: consumer barriers to purchase and marketing options for suboptimal food at retail level: a systematic review. Food Qual Prefer 90:104179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104179 · DOI
  26. Hvitsand C, Leikvoll GKA (2023) Alternative food networks: motivations for engaging in and the contribution to more organic production and consumption of food in REKO networks in Norway. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 47(3):441–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2022.2164823 · DOI
  27. Kareklas I, Carlson JR, Muehling DD (2014) “I eat organic for my benefit and yours”: egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. J Advert 43:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.799450 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kuckartz U (2014) Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice & using software. SAGE, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kumar A, Mangla SK, Kumar P (2022) An integrated literature review on sustainable food supply chains: exploring research themes and future directions. Sci Total Environ 821:153411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153411 · DOI
  30. Lamarque M, Tomé-Martín P, Moro-Gutiérrez L (2023) Personal and community values behind sustainable food consumption: a meta-ethnography. Front Sustain Food 7:1292887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1292887 · DOI
  31. Li S, Jaharuddin NS (2020) Identifying the key purchase factors for organic food among Chinese consumers. Front Bus Res China 14:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00093-3 · DOI
  32. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lombardi A, Migliore G, Verneau F, Schifani G, Cembalo L (2015) Are “good guys” more likely to participate in local agriculture? Food Qual Prefer 45:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.005 · DOI
  34. Maró G, Czine P, Maró ZM, Török A (2022) Eliciting university students’ attitudes towards farmers’ markets: the Hungarian case. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416757 · DOI
  35. Marsden T, Banks J, Bristow G (2000) Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociol Rural 40:424–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00158 · DOI
  36. Menéndez I Molist A, Kallas Z, Guadarrama Fuentes OV (2024) Assessing the downstream and upstream preferences of stakeholders for sustainability attributes in the tomato value chain. Sustainability 16(6):2505 · DOI
  37. Migliore G, Schifani G, Cembalo L (2015) Opening the black box of food quality in the short supply chain: Effects of conventions of quality on consumer choice. Food Qual Pref 39:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.006 · DOI
  38. Neulinger A, Barsony F, Gjorevska N, Lazanyi O, Pataki G, Takacs S, Torok A (2020) Engagement and subjective well-being in alternative food networks: the case of Hungary. Int J Consum Stud 44:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12566 · DOI
  39. Neumann R, Mehlkop G (2023) Revisiting farmers markets: disentangling preferences and conditions of food purchases on countrywide data from Germany. Food Qual Pref 106:104815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104815 · DOI
  40. Oñederra-Aramendi A, Begiristain-Zubillaga M, Malagon-Zaldua E (2018) Who is feeding embeddedness in farmers’ markets? A cluster study of farmers’ markets in Gipuzkoa. J Rural Stud 61:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.05.008 · DOI
  41. Peña Rodríguez FJ, Matarán Ruiz A, Torres Rodríguez AJ, La de Cruz Abarca CE, Sánchez Contreras J, Ruiz Díez A, Visquert Bruguera S, Morilla Moreno JC (2024) Long-time assessment of the organic farmer’s market in Granada (Spain). Sustainability 16(10):4050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104050 · DOI
  42. Petruzzelli M, Ihle R, Colitti S, Vittuari M (2023) The role of short food supply chains in advancing the global agenda for sustainable food systems transitions. Cities 141:104496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104496 · DOI
  43. Renkema M, Hilletofth P (2022) Intermediate short food supply chains: a systematic review. Br Food J 124(13):541–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2022-0463 · DOI
  44. Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 10:221–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50(4):19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · DOI
  46. Schmutz U, Kneafsey M, Kay CS, Doernberg A, Zasada I (2017) Sustainability impact assessments of different urban short food supply chains: examples from London. UK Renew Agric Food Syst 33(6):518–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000564 · DOI
  47. Solomon MR (2019) Consumer behaviour: a European perspective. Pearson, Harlow
  48. Stanco M, Lerro M, Marotta G, Nazzaro C (2019) Consumers’ and farmers’ characteristics in short food supply chains: an exploratory analysis. Stud Agric Econ 121(2):67–74. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1905 · DOI
  49. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81–97
  50. Thomé KM, Cappellesso G, Ramos ELA, Duarte SCdL (2021) Food supply chains and short food supply chains: coexistence conceptual framework. J Clean Prod 278:123207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123207 · DOI
  51. Tiganis A, Grigoroudis E, Chrysochou P (2023) Customer satisfaction in short food supply chains: a multiple criteria decision analysis approach. Food Qual Pref 104:104750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104750 · DOI
  52. Venn L, Kneafsey M, Holloway L, Cox R, Dowler E, Tuomainen H (2006) Researching European ‘alternative’ food networks: some methodological considerations. Area 38(3):248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00694.x · DOI
  53. Vermeir I, Weijters B, de Houwer J, Geuens M, Slabbinck H, Spruyt A, van Kerckhove A, van Lippevelde W, de Steur H, Verbeke W (2020) Environmentally sustainable food consumption: a review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01603 · DOI
  54. Vittersø G, Torjusen H, Laitala K et al (2019) Short food supply chains and their contributions to sustainability: participants’ views and perceptions from 12 European cases. Sustainability 11(17):4800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174800 · DOI
  55. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al (2019) Food in the anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393(10170):447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Zanoli R, Bähr M, Botschen M, Laberenz, H., Naspetti S, Thelen E (2004) The European consumer and organic food. Organic marketing initiatives and rural development (Vol 4) University of Wales, pp 169–175
  57. Zanoli R, Naspetti S, Janssen M, Hamm U (2015) Mediation and moderation in food-choice models: a study on the effects of consumer trust in logo on choice. NJAS: Wagening J Life Sci 72/73:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2015.01.001 · DOI
  58. Zepeda L, Li J (2006) Who buys local food? J Food Distrib Res 37(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.7064 · DOI
  59. Zepeda L, Deal D (2009) Organic and local food consumer behaviour: alphabet theory. Int J Consum Stud 33(6):697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00814.x · DOI
  60. Zoll F, Specht K, Siebert R (2021) Alternative = transformative? Investigating drivers of transformation in alternative food networks in Germany. Sociol Rural 61(3):638–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12350 · DOI
  61. Zoll F, Kirby CK, Specht K, Siebert R (2023) Exploring member trust in German community-supported agriculture: a multiple regression analysis. Agric Human Values 40:709–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10386-3 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Herzig, J., & Zander, K.
Affiliations
University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Herzig, Janna
Venue
Agricultural and Food Economics
Published
2025-06-04
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
2193-7532 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411033481
Cited by
18
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural and Food Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universität Kassel
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
Keywords
short food supply chains, consumer behavior, consumer trust, information availability, consumer attitudes, sociodemographic factors, food distribution, local food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review