Supporting crime script analyses of scams with natural language processing
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, internet connectivity and the ubiquitous use of digital devices have afforded a landscape of expanding opportunity for the proliferation of scams involving attempts to deceive individuals into giving away money or personal information. The impacts of these schemes on victims have shown to encompass social, psychological, emotional and economic harms. Consequently, there is a strong rationale to enhance our understanding of scams in order to devise ways in which they can be disrupted. One way to do so is through crime scripting, an analytical approach which seeks to characterise processes underpinning crime events. In this paper, we explore how Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods might be applied to support crime script analyses, in particular to extract insights into crime event sequences from large quantities of unstructured textual data in a scalable and efficient manner. To illustrate this, we apply NLP methods to a public dataset of victims’ stories of scams perpetrated in Singapore. We first explore approaches to automatically isolate scams with similar modus operandi using two distinct similarity measures. Subsequently, we use Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) to extract key terms in scam stories, which are then used to identify a temporal ordering of actions in ways that seek to characterise how a particular scam operates. Finally, by means of a case study, we demonstrate how the proposed methods are capable of leveraging the collective wisdom of multiple similar reports to identify a consensus in terms of likely crime event sequences, illustrating how NLP may in the future enable crime preventers to better harness unstructured free text data to better understand crime problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have used crime script analysis to map specific types of online scams, such as customer-to-customer e-commerce fraud, bank card fraud and phone scams, and computer fraud.
“Several studies have used crime script analysis to map specific types of online scams, such as customer-to-customer e-commerce fraud (Lee, 2022), bank card fraud and phone scams (Van Nguyen, 2022), and computer fraud (Lwin Tun & Birks, 2023).”
From Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams (2026) · cites this paper as Lwin Tun & Birks, 2023
Cites
The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood
Buchanan, T., & Whitty, M. T. (2014) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.772180 · Cited by 229 · cited 3× · see citing works
“” There have been limited guidance on how crime scripts should be created, as pointed out by Brayley, Cockbain and Laycock (2011), although there have been some attempts to develop structured processes, such as the recent work by Chainey and Berbotto (2021). Notwithstanding, Dehghanniri and Borrion (2021), in their sy…”
BackgroundFischer, P., Lea, S. E. G., & Evans, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12158 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams
Schokkenbroek, J. M., & Snaphaan, T. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251361046 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Several studies have used crime script analysis to map specific types of online scams, such as customer-to-customer e-commerce fraud (Lee, 2022), bank card fraud and phone scams (Van Nguyen, 2022), and computer fraud (Lwin Tun & Birks, 2023).”
- Authors
- Lwin Tun, Z., & Birks, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Venue
- Crime Science
- Published
- 2023-02-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2193-7680 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4319003723
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Crime Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- CrimRxiv (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001569/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Keywords
- online fraud, modus operandi, victim narratives, text similarity measures, TF-IDF, consensus building, unstructured text, crime prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review