Cited by 118Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSpam and Phishing Detection

Why do individuals respond to fraudulent scam communications and lose money? The psychological determinants of scam compliance

Fischer, Peter, Lea, Stephen E. G., Evans, Kath M.·2013·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Why do so many people all over the world, so often, react to completely worthless scam offers? In two questionnaire studies, one of which included the distribution of an experimentally manipulated simulated scam, we investigated differences between respondents who did and did not report past compliance with scams. We found that the principal differences were in their response to very high‐value incentives, in the extent to which they reacted with positive emotions to the thought of winning a large prize, in their reliance on signs of official authority, and in their self‐confidence. The first two of these can be regarded as forms of visceral processing. Some of these differences suggested a dispositional difference between victims and non‐victims.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jasp.12158

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scam victims or near scam victims were more affected by the high values offered in scams and displayed a high degree of trust in the scammers.

    “Fischer et al. 11 found in their survey research that scam victims or near scam victims were more affected by the high values offered in scams and displayed a high degree of trust in the scammers.”
  • There is some support for the notion that some kind of enduring personality trait might increase susceptibility to persuasion.

    “They also found some support for the notion that some kind of enduring personality trait might increase susceptibility to persuasion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, P., Lea, S. E. G., & Evans, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Peter
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-17
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
2060-2072
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2143534599
Cited by
118
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.K. OFT
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
fraud victimization, positive emotions, self-confidence, fraud prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review