Cited by 372Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisReproductive tract infections researchGut microbiota and health

The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk

Open access
Kindinger, Lindsay M., Bennett, Phillip R., Lee, Yun S, Marchesi, Julian R., Smith, Ann, Cacciatore, Stefano, Holmes, Elaine, Nicholson, Jeremy K. +2 more·2017·Microbiome

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in women at risk of preterm birth (n = 161) to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota and cervical length in the second trimester and preterm birth risk and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone on vaginal bacterial communities in women with a short cervix. RESULTS: weeks (n = 18; P < 0.01; 69% PPV). In contrast, Lactobacillus crispatus dominance was highly predictive of term birth (n = 127, 98% PPV). Cervical shortening and preterm birth were not associated with vaginal dysbiosis. A longitudinal characterization of vaginal microbiota (<18, 22, 28, and 34 weeks) was then undertaken in women receiving vaginal progesterone (400 mg/OD, n = 25) versus controls (n = 42). Progesterone did not alter vaginal bacterial community structure nor reduce L. iners-associated preterm birth (<34 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is a risk factor for preterm birth, whereas L. crispatus dominance is protective against preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone does not appear to impact the pregnancy vaginal microbiota. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about "infection risk" associated with the use of a vaginal pessary during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Untreated women attending for colposcopy have a higher risk of preterm birth than women without CIN, probably explained by inherent characteristics and genetic, epigenetic, or microbiome factors.

    “Untreated women attending for colposcopy have a higher risk of preterm birth than do women without CIN, probably explained by inherent characteristics and genetic, epigenetic, or microbiome factors.40, 41, 42”

    From Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Results section reports an association between vaginal microbiota and preterm birth in women already at high risk, and the Discussion suggests possible microbiome-related mechanisms. The paper does not compare untreated women attending colposcopy with women without CIN, or attribute such a difference to inherent, genetic, or epigenetic factors. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women who went on to experience spontaneous PTB were less likely to exhibit a vaginal microbiota dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus.

    “Women who went on to experience spontaneous PTB were less likely to exhibit a vaginal microbiota dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus, as previously reported in other populations59–62”

    From The Integrative Human Microbiome Project (2019) · cites this paper as [61]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 372

Authors
Kindinger, L. M., Bennett, P. R., Lee, Y. S., Marchesi, J. R., Smith, A., Cacciatore, S., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., Teoh, T. G., & MacIntyre, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
MacIntyre, David A.
Venue
Microbiome
Published
2017-01-19
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
6-6
ISSN
2049-2618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2572899228
Cited by
372
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 11
FWCI
26.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Microbiome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (P45272)
  • Genesis Research Trust (P51389)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L009226/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
preterm birth, vaginal microbiota, cervical length, vaginal progesterone, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus crispatus, vaginal dysbiosis, second trimester, pessary, infection risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Cervix Uteri, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Lactobacillus, Pessaries, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Progesterone, Prospective Studies, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Vagina, Pregnancy, High-Risk, Premature Birth, Cervical Length Measurement, Young Adult, Bacterial Load, Microbiota, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review