Cited by 16Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Medication and psychotherapy in eating disorders: is there a gap between research and practice?

Open access
Cooper, Myra, Kelland, Hannah·2015·Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little research has investigated the use of evidence-based guidelines by eating disorder (ED) therapists, or prescribing of psychotropic medication. Moreover, people with EDs have rarely been surveyed on these topics, and their clinical and demographic features have not been presented. This study investigated perception of psychotherapy, psychotropic medication and the clinical characteristics of a community sample of people with EDs. METHOD: An online survey methodology was used to recruit 253 people with eating disorders in the community. Where feasible, comparisons were made between four types of eating disorder, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and two types of atypical or 'sub-threshold' eating disorder. RESULTS: Unlike medication, reported psychotherapy showed some congruence with evidence based and other guidance. Most participants were currently receiving either psychotherapy, medication or both, and most had a severe and chronic ED. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are considered in light of use of evidence-based treatment for EDs, calls for greater dissemination of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT); indications that much may be poor quality; and the importance of what treatments to offer those who are chronically and severely ill. Development of theory and novel treatments is considered a priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40337-015-0080-0

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Zigmond AS Snaith RP The hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psych Scand 1983 67 361 370 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x 6880820 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [21]Fairburn CG Cooper Z Fairburn CG Wilson GT The Eating Disorder Examination Eating disorders and obesity 1993 New York Guilford Press 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, M., & Kelland, H.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Cooper, Myra
Venue
Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2015-12
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
45-45
ISSN
2050-2974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187556136
Cited by
16
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
eating disorders, psychotropic drugs, psychotherapy, evidence-based treatment, treatment gap, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, cognitive behavioral therapy, patient perspectives, community sample

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review